Saturday, March 31, 2007

A Troll Gets His Due

I've been following, and participating, in a tit-for-tat with a troll who has taken up residence at FreedomFolks using the nom-de-keyboard "hannitized." He's not really worthy of the level of respect I usually demand to bring up such lunacy; he ran away from this blog's comment section after I made it clear that he would not be allowed to post non-sequitur and/or nonsensical Leftist links to make his feeble points. I'll not be a party to driving traffic, and its related profit, to the DailyKos or Indymedia crowd. The only reason I bring him up now is that this troll's comments serve as the archetype evil for anyone who is trying to make a point about the vital dangers of multiculturalism, the cultural emptiness of diversity, and the inescapable primacy of tribal instinct - hard-coded into human nature - that makes promoting a too-heterogeneous society so horrifically wrong.

A couple of weeks ago, I decided that it was beneath my standards to address this quasi-sentient infestation directly at my friends' blog, so I began to comment on his comments in the third person. I also assumed a mocking tone and made every effort to find a more appropriate moniker for him. Eventually, I settled on "hispandertized" because it best described his position on most things: He's got a monumental inferiority complex that exhibits itself in puffed-up "my people are superior to your people, but your people STOLE OUR LANDS and made us less great than we ought to be" attitude. Every time another "American-by-technicality" is born into a family like that which begat this hispantertized pathogen, there is made another weak link in the chain that binds Americans together.

We are made less when such trolls have sex, except with themselves.

What's most laughable, and sad, about Jake's week-kneed little parasite is that he really doesn't know to what tribe he belongs. Sometimes he's a Spaniard, sometimes he's an indigenous Mexica, sometimes he's a Native American. But never, no never, is he an American - even though ours is the nation to which he was born, and he probably would swear to which he remains allegiant. But his rantings betray him. He hates America. He hates it's origins. He hates anything that might be a byproduct of Western Civilization's success especially if its origin is even tangentially Anglo Saxon.

But he loves all things Mexican.

Mexico's indigenous tribes can do no wrong in his book. America would be best served if that third-world nation's people could freely retake the lands America won, then purchased 150 years ago. To him, the "indigenous peoples" still own it depite the fact that the mythical lands of Atzlan were Mexican territory for barely a quarter-century before America fought and won them in a war. Most of us know that reconquista is not a salient point of view for a true American; however, it is an unwavering belief for most Mexicans.

Hispandertized is walking, talking proof that some tribes just will never assimilate fully to the American way. The longer we allow the alien invasion, particularly from our south, to proceed at such breakneck pace, the harder it will be for this nation to remain unified throughout its next generations. I have to thank this troll for being exemplar of how foolishly wrong the notion that "all peoples are compatible with American ideals" really is.

Seeing that hispandertized lives to browbeat us with the wonders and moral superiority of the indegnous people's of Mexico, I thought I'd close with an brilliant example of those "wonders."

Enjoy:

Mordida, Bribes - Some Things in Mexico Seem To Never Change

In Chiapas, the Chamula Indians obligate their tribesmen to be members of the ruling PRI party. Anyone in the tribe who prefers membership in a different party or even criticizes the PRI is ostracized and driven from their tribal lands. The PRI maintains this loyalty by providing the Chamulas with the Coca Cola franchise for the region. Big time mordida.



When creatures like hispandertized call me a "racist," it's confirmation that I'm correct in my analysis of the alien invasion. How ironic is it that he cannot acknowledge the tribal preference for one's own kind that motivates him! Only someone filled with equal parts hate for his nation and self-loathing would invade someone else's Internet domain, build a soapbox there and do nothing but berate the virtual townsfolk who happen by.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Oh dem RACIST Cherokees

This news item should have some PC heads exploding today. Imagine, a people determining by vote as to whom qualifies for being part of their nation! It's almost as if they would wish to have immigration and citizenship laws or something - and that they be enforced! OMG!


Cherokees vote out slaves' descendants - Yahoo! News

"'The Cherokee people exercised the most basic democratic right, the right to vote,' tribal Principal Chief Chad Smith said. 'Their voice is clear as to who should be citizens of the Cherokee Nation. No one else has the right to make that determination.'"
Seriously, the Cherokees are right. But I'll bet that nobody, even the most mentally-challenged Leftist, has the gall to wage a war of political correctness upon them.

If only so many American citizens were not so wussified...


Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Orwell Lives In UK!

I'll presume he's not eating at McDonalds so as not to upset Prince Charles and his showhound, Camilla.

Saying 'bloody foreigner' is ruled racist Uk News News Telegraph
Law Lords have ruled that calling someone a "bloody foreigner" and saying "get back to your own country" can amount to racial abuse.
This is from the land of "thought crime." The politically correct religiously secular left must clip headlines like this for their collages. Surely it's a papier mache and Elmer's glue night somewhere because of this!

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Revisting the Evils of the Anti-Racists

For the past few days I've been parrying with a decidedly inferiority-complex-bound intellect (I use the term loosely) in the comments section over at FreedomFolks who is openly determined to promote unfettered mass immigration as a penance for the evils of his ancestors. I've rarely come across someone so consumed by self-loathing in the 13 years I've been posting stuff on the Internet; today, the insistent little gnat came out of the closet and revealed his guilt for having Spanish, Italian and "Native American" blood. It appears he believes he must make amends with the "Indian" part of himself for the things that his Spaniard ancestors did. It all would be comical and laughable if his premise were not so pathetic, and his desire to take the nation down with him so virulent. I guess his being miserable about the combination of genes with which he was born isn't enough, he has to make us share his despair.

No thanks.

As is the case with all discussions in which a leftist is the antagonist, the time is fast approaching in which we can all invoke Godwin's Law and be done with him. He's already devolved into calling racist anyone who disagrees with his assessment that this nation is evil and must make amends for every wrong he perceives it has ever done by allowing ourselves to be over-run by the denizens of the third world. Right now, he's stuck on ad-hominems about our being bigoted for even thinking that this nation has a culture we should be concerned about keeping. Such is the plight of the anti-racist: He cannot see that he has become the reverse-actualization of the very figment-evil he decries.

All of this got me to thinking about a long ago post in which I agreed with Jim Kalb's assessment of the anti-racists. Nearly two years after the fact, this page is one of the most read of all I've ever posted here. And I think it's time that I bring Kalb's work to the forefront again. After all, the time I wasted responding to guilt-ridden trolls has to be good for something, right?

Anti-racism -- Jim Kalb

Indeed, anti-racism requires anti-majority racism. An anti-racist ruling class must treat the majority as presumptively wrong. "Ingrained social stereotypes" -- the culture and habits of the majority -- must be discredited because their dominance puts minorities at a disadvantage. Since habits and culture are what make a people what it is, the things that make the majority a people must be attacked; the majority must be defined as racist, and therefore evil and unfit to rule or even exist. "Racist" has the same function today that "nigger" once did: it makes a man less than human and so unfit for self-government.

Attempts to abolish deeply rooted human tendencies are necessarily tyrannical; "rule by the people" is absurd when a government that loses confidence in the people can dissolve it and form a new one. Such attempts inevitably fail, and succeed only in destroying traditional restraints. Attempts in Russia to abolish the profit motive ended, after unparalleled brutality and massacre, in lawless greed and mafia rule. It is not clear why attempts to abolish ethnicity should be more successful.

Rather than attempt a utopian transformation of human nature, it seems better to accept the distinctions men find important, and let them deal with them in customary ways that make sense to those involved; abuses and extreme cases can be dealt with as such. Things classified as racism -- ethnic loyalty and dominance -- are necessary features of social life. Something as closely related as ethnicity is to men's habits, attitudes and loyalties is plainly relevant to participation in a common effort like carrying on a business. The fact that men universally take ethnicity into account in choosing associates is the best possible evidence that it makes sense for them to do so.

For the last two years, I've lived in a rather mixed-ethnicity and mixed-race neighborhood. The student-of-human-nature part of me has been fascinated by the self-segregation that goes on here. Despite this being a very liberal and leftist college town, and despite my neighbors being predominately leftist in political persuasion, the strongest bonds I see growing in this most "utopian" for the multiculturalist setting, are between people who are of the same ethnicity and the same race. While we all exchange superficial pleasantries, the only times I have witnessed or participated in deep conversations about substantive issues, the participants have obvious ancient-tribal similarities. Heck, we even self-segregate our seating arrangements at our homeowners' association meetings. I notice this stuff and wonder who else sees the same things.

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , ,

|