Wednesday, May 02, 2007

The Birds: Author Unknown

I do not know the original author of this piece, but I agree wholeheartedly. It came as a forward in my morning email today from a friend who normally doesn't usually care all that much about the invasion. Perhaps yesterday's lunacy has raised the hackles of more fence-sitters. I certainly hope so:

I bought a bird feeder. I hung it on my back porch and filled it with seed.

Within a week we had hundreds of birds taking advantage of the continuous flow of free and easily accessible food. But then the birds started building nests in the boards of the patio, above the table, and next to the barbecue.

Then came the poop. It was everywhere: on the patio tile, the chairs, the table...everywhere. Then some of the birds turned mean: They would dive bomb me and try to peck me even though I had fed them out of my own pocket. And others birds were boisterous and loud: They sat on the feeder and squawked and screamed at all hours of the day and night and demanded that I fill it when it got low on food. After a while, I couldn't even sit on my own back porch anymore. I took down the bird feeder and in three days the birds were gone.

I cleaned up their mess and took down the many nests they had built all over the patio. Soon, the back yard was like it used to be...quiet, serene and no one demanding their rights to a free meal.

Now lets see...our government gives out free food, subsidized housing, free medical care, free education and allows anyone born here to be a automatic citizen. Then the illegals came by the tens of thousands. Suddenly our taxes went up to pay for free services; small apartments are housing 5 families: you have to wait 6 hours to be seen by an emergency room doctor; your child's 2nd grade class is behind other schools because over half the class doesn't speak English. Corn Flakes now come in a bilingual box; I have to press "one" to hear my bank talk to me in English, and people waving flags other than "Old Glory" are squawking and screaming in the streets, demanding more rights and free liberties.

Maybe it's time for the government to take down the bird feeder.

Yesterday was another example of how inhospitable to its owners our leaders are making "America's back porch." But it's still nothing that some consistent, dedicated effort cannot overcome - no matter what the sad sack in the White House might say to the contrary.


Technorati tags: , , ,

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Happy Socialist, Anarchist, Illegal Alien Day

I'm not going to get a chance to post much on this new day of arrogance. I've let my U.S. Senator from Cuba know I loathe him. I've ranted to a few friends who still don't see the threat that the interlopers pose to their children, and I wrote one comment on a blog.

That's what I'm copying over here. First, I'll repost the original pabulum:

howl

Count my voice among those who are today marching and asking for a path to citizenship for immigrants in this country. Look, I know they broke the law by coming here (I won't even get into how suspect it is for countries to set their own laws on immigration and expect citizens of another country to just follow them), but what right do we have to demand that they not enter our borders? For all America is doing wrong, it is still the most free country in the world and the one most able to provide a good life for its inhabitants. How can we expect people to not come to this country if we can offer them such a better life than the one they have in other countries? How can we, and especially myself and other Christians, tell people to not come to us even though we can help them? Since when is the saying on the Statue of Liberty about "bring me your huddled masses..." a epithet without meaning?

Too often we americans forget that our history is, in certain areas, largely one of breaking laws and theft and questionable citizenship. We stole land from the indians and just arbitrarily said it was ours; it's not like we Americans were the first ones on the scene here. We fought wars to gain our own independence because we believed that America could hold a better life. We welcomed immigrants from Europe from the thousands, laying the groundwork for the America we have today with our rich differing cultures and dialects and traditions. We are not a nation of indigenous peoples. We are a nation built on a history of huddled masses, immigrants, poverty-stricken farmers, religious freedom-seekers, soldiers, land-grabbers, and dreamers.

How can we deny anyone else in this whole world the same thing? Happy May Day, everyone.




Katie's Dad said...

When Emma Lazarus rises from the dead and proves she was a founding father, not some PR-Stunt poetry contest winner, then I might have a thimble of compassion for an illegal alien. But probably not then, either. For she was nothing more than a foil for a newspaperman's quest for profit. No figure in American history is more over-promoted. It's just sick to base policy that determines who we are, and what sort of fate-in-nation awaits our ancestors, upon that blithering tripe of a poem. Really.

Being romantically distracted by baseless ideals while deadly serious issues like sovereignty and societal cohesiveness are at stake is the epitome of stupidity.

Instead, I'm informed by Thomas Jefferson who wrote:"In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass."

George Washington said, prescriptively: "Citizens, by birth or choice, of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles."

John Jay wrote, also prescriptively: "I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people -- a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.

"This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties."


As a Christian, you'd be better served by thinking about the plight of the people these interloping opportunists leave behind; the poverty they exacerbate back home; the broken families; the elderly with no youth to support them in a a community; the tacit support your compassion gives to despots who are relieved to see the departure of those who are most physically able to threaten their corrupt status quo; and, most importantly, the detrimental impact upon the futures of America's children that such an unprecedented influx surely portends. Do you ever think about that stuff? Or has the romanticism for the "needy other" completely made you blind to
the needs and best interests of your own?

Is it OK if one in five of our residents has no connection to, empathy for or sense of stewardship on behalf of those who fought and bled and died to start this grand experiment? Even if that assures that heritage is erased? And even if the loss of that heritage puts an end to the experiment?

If so, please send your kids to schools built in the shadow of your new Tower of Babel; but, please, make provisions for mine to go to schools in which english is the only language allowed to be spoken. While you're at it, give my little girl a place to grow up in which this nation's sense of Providence is allowed to thrive without being held hostage to the influence of those who would sell it all out on a whim.

I was tempted to beat the author up over his asinine "we stole the land from the indians" crap, but I figured he'd not be able to digest any additional de-programming thoughts in one post.


Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

|

Monday, April 16, 2007

McCain Wouldn't Know Conservatism If...

...it bit him on the ass.

This just doesn't square.
G.O.P. Candidates Lay Into Democrats, Not One Another - New York Times

“The Republican Party — and conservatism generally — are a philosophy of strength,” he said. “Military strength, economic strength, personal strength and family strength.”

-Senator John "I never met an amnesty I didn't love" McCain

How could a person with any scruples whatsoever fish for votes with such soaring language when what he says runs so contrary to his grandest desire as a politician: giving amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens and setting off an unprecedented chain migration?

Please bear with me as I parse this quote and expound on the double meanings:

  1. "Conservatism is a philosophy of strength," but I believe our nation is weak and needs help from millions of indentured servants.
  2. "Conservatism is a philosophy of military strength," but let's disregard the fact that America's political-philospher founders warned against submitting to or leveraging into too strong influences and alliances with foreign powers.
  3. "Conservatism is a philosophy of economic strength," as long as the government is made stronger than the people through control of people's purse strings.
  4. "Conservatism is a philosophy of personal strength," as long as people don't display it in the form of speech too close to an election.
  5. "Conservatism is a philosophy of family strength," and we can't get enough of those strong Mexican families and we can't be deterred by mere citizens who because they want to keep their heritage will stand in the way .
It seems like every day Senator McAmnesty just keeps giving this Conservatives like me more reasons to despise him. Even if I didn't believe with all my heart and soul that the man truly wants to sell my child's future to the highest big-business bidder via amnesty, there's always his McCain-Feingold subversion of the First Amendment, his opposing tax cuts that work and his support for the gay agenda.

But even if none of those things were the case I'd still oppose him with all my being; my political gut and human instinct tell me that he is an evil person. When I see or hear him speak, it sets off alarms within me that have never been wrong in the 27 years I've been involved in political campaigns. It took an awful lot of working for candidates who set off my "creep-o-meter" before I started paying attention to my senses. The lesson has sunk in: I won't ever again vote for someone for whom I have such a visceral distrust.

The bottom line: I loathe John McCain and wouldn't vote for him if satan himself were on the other side - how would I choose between two equal evils?

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , , ,

|

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Bush's Mexican Sell-Out Redux

Bush's goal regarding "migration" for this hemisphere, as made crystal clear by his remarks the other day, can only result in the growth of a metastatic fifth-column of those who while being technically "American citizens" will pledge their allegiance to Mexico.

Linknzona (newly added to my blogroll) noted that several bloggers have posted Bush's promise to the Mexican people to do all he can to grant amnesty under the guise of "comprehensive immigration reform." I published an article on March 13 as did TBC here, and Linknzona here.

My comments on Linknzona's March 13 post are repeated, at his request, here, and at his site:

"Over at my blog, I've expressed similar outrage regarding Bush's commitments to Mexican citizens. As soon as I read what he said, it started the wheels turning; there was so much concern on the part of the founding fathers about the risks involved in allowing foreign interests to influence this nation's sovereign responsibilities.

The first five Federalist Papers were warnings against allowing alien interests too much say in our affairs. Jefferson expounded in Notes on Virginia similarly. I knew there was a lot of source material out there that would, when placed in juxtaposition to Bush's words in Mexico, reveal why this president has become a threat to our sovereignty and a possible scourge who will be reviled by future generations of Americans. If he gets his way on Amnesty, his legacy will be to be remembered as the man who forced us to take the first big step toward our nation's dissolution.

After looking through my favorite historical quotes, I decided that George ashington gave us the best example to use for determining what's wrong with this president. He said in his farewell address:

"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial, else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests."

Bush sounds more like a man who thinks of himself as president of the Western Hemisphere, not of our sovereign nation. I believe that were Washington, Jay, Madison and Hamilton here today, they'd conclude that this man is behaving as a traitor and fight to have him removed from office.

It's tough to swallow, but his words and actions really have sunk to the depths of treason."
Others are expressing outrage in the Blogosphere, here, here, here, here and here, for a start. There are a lot of folks who are appalled by these comments. I imagine it's really hard to finally wake up and realize the president you supported and voted for doesn't care about you or your nation at all.


Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Friday, March 16, 2007

Quote of the Day

Heck, this could be the quote of the month and year:

"There is an emerging hierarchy in the world economy in which the best-paid jobs are clustered in certain nations. If America wants to be a sustainably rich nation with well-paid workers, we must explicitly compete for these jobs.

"This cannot possibbly be a matter of laissez-faire indifference in any society. The fundamental problem with laissez-faire is that it doesn't care who wins.

"And it is impossible to be too blunt about the fact that $5/hr. workers at McDonalds are not going to vote Republican. If we want a conservative society, we need to make sure we have the kind of economic base that will produce Republican voters. End of story."

-Robert Locke

Man, that's so right on.

Technorati tags: ,

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Impeach Bush Over Ramos and Compean?

I'd not have thought of it, but when a Republican Congressman draws the scenario...

Bush facing potential "Watergate" over refusal to pardon Agents (OneNewsNow.com)

"Congressman [Dana] Rohrabacher said if either Ramos or Compean were to be killed in prison by the inmates, that impeachment proceedings would be started in the House of Representatives," Corsi notes. "Now, that's the first time impeachment has been mentioned by a responsible public official," he says, "so I know this is a case that has high stakes for the White House."

...it makes a lot of sense. I'd go so far as to say that if either agent were seriously wounded while being held captive by the Bush weasels, then let the proceedings begin.


Technorati tags:

Labels: , , ,

|

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Gates Sells Whine At Microsoft

It's a sad statement that one of this nation's greatest innovators has joined in our Plutocratic Overlords' quest for cheap labor.
FT.com / World / US & Canada - Gates warns on US immigration curbs
Mr Gates said he felt “deep anxiety” about the US’s ability to remain competitive if it did not act quickly to improve education, invest in basic science research, and reform its immigration ­policies.
The key fallacy here is that if Gates and his greedy globalist cohort get more labor via visa workers there will be no incentive for our bastions of higher learning to improve the educational lot of the average American. More visa slots means more chances to sell higher-priced tuitions to aliens - and that is where they will focus their efforts. Any "improvement" and new investment in research will disproportionately be skewed to benefit the very aliens who would come here on student visas knowing that there was a work visa waiting at the end of their educational journey. It's a closed loop that shuts American kids out. If there had never been a student visa program to begin with, we'd be growing our own engineers and scientist much more capably than we are today.

If the Visa programs were eliminated completely tomorrow, we'd not only start educating more American kids and force colleges to presssure state school systems to improve their results, we'd also stop making people who want to kill us more capable of doing so. When I was in school, there were tons of Iranians on my campus. My bet is that at least some of them are now involved in building nuclearn weapons for Iran. And how come nobody ever points out that Al Quaeda sorts are highly educated, many of whom have had their educations underwritten by the boneheaded leadership of Western nations that now can't seem to figure the proper way to define our war against radical Islam. Who cares if we look less magnanimous to the rest of the world? Does it really make them hate us less if we look helpful?

Uh. No.

It's not as if figuring this stuff out takes a rocket-science-level intellect; in fact, I'm sure that most Congresscritters know exactly the way this crap works. They just won't say it for fear that your knowing would hurt them.

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , ,

|

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Oh dem RACIST Cherokees

This news item should have some PC heads exploding today. Imagine, a people determining by vote as to whom qualifies for being part of their nation! It's almost as if they would wish to have immigration and citizenship laws or something - and that they be enforced! OMG!


Cherokees vote out slaves' descendants - Yahoo! News

"'The Cherokee people exercised the most basic democratic right, the right to vote,' tribal Principal Chief Chad Smith said. 'Their voice is clear as to who should be citizens of the Cherokee Nation. No one else has the right to make that determination.'"
Seriously, the Cherokees are right. But I'll bet that nobody, even the most mentally-challenged Leftist, has the gall to wage a war of political correctness upon them.

If only so many American citizens were not so wussified...


Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Welcome to Another Cavalcade of Conservatism

Now, for another honor roll of Internet tidbits, blogging brilliance and other general Conservative crispness **:

LinknZona: From High Positions
At what point does [Bush's] stubbornness in disdain for his country and its supporters and in love for and support of a foreign power, Mexico, cause many American patriots to lose faith in their president? I don’t know, and I doubt if anyone does. But sometime between 9/11 and 2006 it happened. Many came to wonder how effective it was in protecting America to fight a war on terror in one part of the world and encourage everyone, including those same terrorists, to cross our borders at will.
Let's hope that enough people stop drinking the Kool Aid to stop this man of mundane intellect on a fools errand from ruining the nation we leave to our children.

Becoming American

The question of American national identity and the strength of our attachments to the American national community is, given our diversity, perhaps the most important domestic national question facing this country. Some dismiss these concerns as being based on “outdated theories.” Others urge Americans to accept other possible platforms for solidarity like “new diasporas, transnational civil society, and other identity groups” and the “thinning out of national ties” and argue that “it is time to accept an America . . . whose bonds are secondary to other forms of association.”

For the sake of the viability of this republic and its people and institutions, let us hope not.

There's a key point here: There are a lot of Americans - even a lot of Conservatives - who must be disabused of contemporary and too widely accepted leftists beliefs that diminish the importance of Citizens having primary and sole allegiance to this nation if they are to be truly American, and for America to continue to exist.

UN opposes proposed Nigerian ban on same-sex relationships - Africa
Four UN special rapporteurs on racism, violence against women, xenophobia and related intolerance said in a statement that the draft bill is 'an absolutely unjustified intrusion of individuals' right to privacy' and goes against the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The same folks who want to force the world to pay for global warming want to be the definers of what is morally proper. Nope, no global government aspirations to see here folks. Move along.

Free Trade and Funny Math by Patrick J. Buchanan - HUMAN EVENTS

Economic nationalism is the policy of rising powers, free trade the policy of declining powers. For great powers have ever regarded trade as an arena of struggle in the clash of nations. It is no accident all four presidents who made it to Mount Rushmore were protectionists.
That's powerful. Right now, being protectionist is not in favor. Why? Because those who control the information flow are pure, free-trade globalists who think the concept of a "soveriegn nation" is quaint.


Townhall.com::Prosecutor's discretion::By Debra J. Saunders


Last month, when Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean began serving 11-year and 12-year prison sentences, respectively, for shooting at a fleeing drug smuggler, many Americans were outraged that the federal government would prosecute two agents for doing their jobs. Their trial uncovered policies that seem designed to undermine success -- such as the rule that prohibits agents from pursuing a speeding suspected smuggler without a supervisor's authorization.

Drug smugglers know that if they speed to the border, they'll likely get away. Former U.S. Border Patrol Agent David Ham points toward the location at Fabens, Texas, on Monday, Feb. 5, 2007, where former Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean shot drug smuggler Osvaldo Davila last year. The agents began serving prison sentences in January after their convictions in the incident.

But the real outrage in this story is how federal prosecutors used their discretion to shelter a drug smuggler and go after two men who, at the worst, should have been fired for shooting at the smuggler and then not reporting what they had done. The outrage is that this case ever came to trial.
Once this is cleared up, can we shoot the freaking prosecutor in the ass with salt-buckshot in the public square? When I was a kid, there was a kooky old lady in the neighborhood who would shoot kids in the ass with the stuff if they rode bikes on her property. While I was never hit, I recall seeing the results. Painful.


Atlas Shrugs: KENT STATE:IN THE NAME OF OBL. THE YEAR OF ISLAMIC VICTORY!" YourTaxdollars at Work
He was drawing a paycheck from the people of the State of Ohio while trying to launch a Jihad against people like me. In fact, just five minutes before I called he posted an entry under the title "Crusaders Can’t Take Anymore in Afghanistan!"
Two Word Solution: National Guard


Lincoln Tribune - Bank Boycott Coalition Releases List of Illegal Alien Banks - Politics - News
A coalition of over 100 anti-illegal immigration groups that are boycotting Bank of America are releasing a broader survey of banks, in order to assist consumers in relocating their money to banks that are not in the business of aiding and abetting illegal aliens!
They should at least change their name to Scumbank of America.


Muhammad Dressup
Praise Allah! It's the Prophet Muhammad riding his flying donkey up to heaven, and he wants you to dress him up in something special before he gets there! It's so easy! Just drag the items to him with your mouse and they'll snap right into place.
This is actually kind of fun to play around with!


blonde sagacity: A Rape Tree Grows Out West
It seems that when woman employ the "guides" that take you across the Mexican -U.S. border (called "Coyotes"), one thing these women must endure is the routine practice of being raped and as a visual reminder to all that come after --her bloodstains are left in the dirt and her panties are hung from the branches of a tree.
This was news to me. You've gotta see the pictures!


From My Position... On the way!: What Carren thinks of Senator McCain

Senator is not a word I would use for McCain. JERK (or asshat, as Chuck usually says) is more like it. When Chuck was in the hospital, Jerk came to "visit" us.

A quick story before I tell you what happened: A few weeks before Chuck was wounded I watched a TV movie that protrayed Jerk's time as a POW during Vietnam. I was intrigued by the story and developed a lot of respect for what he endured, and the fact that his wife waited all those years for him to return home. I knew bits and pieces of the story before watching the movie, and I knew his arms were badly damaged due to the torture he received. I had a lot of respect for the man... then I met him.

When he first walked in I was honored to meet him. He shook my hand and Alice's hand, then walked over to Chuck's bedside. After a lousy 5 minutes or so, the Jerk said (and I quote):

"Well, we all know what we're here for... let's do the photo op."

EXCUSE ME!!!??? The PHOTO OP???!!!!

What an effing loon...and he want's to be your president!


American Chronicle: Amnesty The Day Bush Killed America, If 30 million Ilegals are Good, Why Not 300 million?
President Bush, you defined your legacy well. Your name will live in perpetual infamy as the man that killed America. You have already replaced Benedict Arnold as the example of traitorous behavior but you have not gone as low as you can go. The ignoble day legislation granting amnesty or guest worker status to millions of illegals is passed, will go down in history with recognition equal to the day John Kennedy died, the Alamo, Pearl Harbor, 9-11, and Neville Chamberlain’s “peace in our time” declaration. All will remember where they were when Bush killed America. Mark that day well; you will need to explain to your children why you did nothing to stop it.
Bush is actually worse than all of those formerly breathing traitors put together. But let's not quibble about degree when we're so far immersed in Hell.


American Chronicle: Approve Amnesty? Then Drop the White House American flag, Spit, Piss on it, and burn it.
If Bush, Specter, McCain, Kennedy, Reid and the other Bushite corrupt leaders in congress pass a bill that conforms to Mexico’s demands, they should sign it in front of the Capitol Building with a big background “Mission Accomplished’ banner. At the same time they can lower the American flag to the ground, spit and piss on it, burn it and replace it with a white flag of surrender along with a Mexican, North American Union and World Trade Organization flags. Let them all be there for the photo-op so we will know who is lying when they blame our country’s ruin on others.
I want to start a rock group in which all the performers wear masks of politicians who want amnesty. The name of the group? How's "Deep Fried Surrender Monkeys" sound?


Democrats Worried About Offending Illegal Aliens!
As if the Democrats' mad rush to remake America into a third-world colony of Mexico were not bad enough, now a mindless liberal actually wants to scrap the First Amendment by banning use of the term "Illegal Alien" in what used to be the Great state of Florida.
Fredericka Wilson, the bill's sponsor, is probably the dumbest ball of lint excuse for an elected official I've ever had the pleasure of avoiding meeting at a social event.


The Sun Sets in the West by Patrick J. Buchanan - HUMAN EVENTS
In the early years of World Wars I and II, Europeans implored us to come save them from the Germans. We did. In the early Cold War, Europeans welcomed returning GIs who stood guard in the Fulda Gap. Now, with the threat gone, the gratitude is gone. Now, with their welfare states eating up their wealth, their peoples aging, their cities filling up with militant migrants, they want America to continue defending them, as they sit in moral judgment on how we go about it. This isn't an alliance. This isn't a partnership. Time to split the blanket. If they won't defend themselves, let them, as weaker nations have done to stronger states down through the ages, pay tribute
Pay up, Euroweenies!


Globalism: Enemy of the Middle Class -- February 2007 Phyllis Schlafly Report
Globalism is the enemy of the middle class. Globalism preaches that the world is flat; that nations should have no borders; that labor, capital, goods and services should flow freely between countries. Globalism's mantras are "free trade" and "abolish protectionism." Globalism forces American workers to compete against people who work in other countries for 30 cents an hour without benefits. Competing with such low wages means the end of the American middle class. Americans relish competition, as our national fixation on sports contests proves every day. But global trade is not played on a level playing field — our opponents don't play by the rules and the umpire (the World Trade Organization) is biased against us.
That's the big thing that most middle class supporters of globalization don't get: If it really happens all the way, then there won't be a middle class anywhere on earth. Those who are currently are American middle class workers by default will fall to the bottom. Nobody at the top will look out for their interests.


Auto Graveyard by Patrick J. Buchanan - HUMAN EVENTS
The world is witnessing the passing of the United States as the greatest industrial power and the most self-sufficient republic the world had ever seen. Yet, no one acts. Why? Ideology is one reason. Free-trade fanatics are like those devout Christians who will not undergo surgery, even if their malady is killing them. Second, there are the obtuse who simply cannot see that our "trade partners" have found a way around the rules and are skinning us alive. Third, to gain and hold high office, candidates of both parties depend on the contributions of a monied elite, whose salaries, bonuses, stock options and golden parachutes depend on a rising share price, which means constantly cutting costs by moving production out of United States and getting rid of high-wage American workers. There are rewards for economic treason.
I hate it that we are being so badly hosed while most of my neighbors and friends remain ignorant to what is really going on.


Gates of Vienna: Running Scared in Red House
“Yeah, he used to be all gung-ho and say things like ‘we’re not going to put up with this crap’ — he was all ready to take ’em on. But not long ago he ran into one of those Muslims down at the convenience store [at the corner of Rolling Hill Road and SR 727] and got into an argument. And would you believe, that sucker went to his van and pulled an assault rifle on him. Ever since then he’s been keeping a low profile — he doesn’t want anything else to happen to him, so he’s laying low.” This is a textbook example of mau-mauing in action. But it’s the most hardcore example of mau-mauing I’ve ever personally heard of. The Great Jihad operates by stealth. The knife at the throat is not its primary weapon of aggression; it prefers to erode our defenses incrementally, using social pressure, legal action, media manipulation, subversion, and good old-fashioned intimidation.
There's some scary crap going on in rural Virginia. I kid you not.


The Freedom Fighter's Journal: American Traitor Of The Week: JULIO PINO
The Second Award of "American Traitor Of The Week" goes to the vile and disgusting Julio Pino, an alleged professor and intellectual, who somehow wormed his cowardly way into a job at Kent State in Ohio. A pity we can't send the Ohio National Guard to the Kent State campus for a military style execution at sunrise tomorrow, as this piece of subhuman scum so richly deserves. Are there any patriots active in this part of Ohio? I have the address of some trash that needs to be taken out and dumped at the county landfill.
Ah! Yes! The National Guard!


Liberty Counsel News Release March 2, 2007
The students gathered in the cafeteria before school to pray, but a Satanist student went to the school office and complained. As a result, Vice Principal Otoupal told the Christian students they could not pray in the cafeteria but would have to go outside. After the students insisted on praying in the cafeteria because of inclement weather, Otoupal suspended them for ten days.
So, a Satanist can walk into a principal's office and be taken seriously? We're in bigger trouble than I thought...

Technorati tags:


**WARNING - not intended for consumption by leftists, ignoramuses, anyone with a smarmy web moniker like "Hannitized," or anyone who thinks that AlGore deserves the Nobel Prize because he won an Oscar.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

|

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Orwell Lives In UK!

I'll presume he's not eating at McDonalds so as not to upset Prince Charles and his showhound, Camilla.

Saying 'bloody foreigner' is ruled racist Uk News News Telegraph
Law Lords have ruled that calling someone a "bloody foreigner" and saying "get back to your own country" can amount to racial abuse.
This is from the land of "thought crime." The politically correct religiously secular left must clip headlines like this for their collages. Surely it's a papier mache and Elmer's glue night somewhere because of this!

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Political correctness would have killed the colonists

I really enjoy Gates of Vienna. Each visit to this blog provides food for thought. Today, I'm just going to link to a comment that was elevated to the front page. It falls right in line with everything I hope, dream and fear for our nation. Brilliant!

Gates of Vienna: A Stirring in the Forest

The American spirit that our ancestors harnessed to conquer this continent lies
somewhat dormant today, especially in certain regions of America. Our ancestors woke up in a world every morning where there were other groups of humans in the woods with a uncompromising violent warrior ideology looking to butcher our families. In an environment like that you couldn’t afford to let political correctness dictate your responses. You couldn’t wait for the authorities to come protect you. You had to be willing to take responsibility for your family’s survival into your own hands, and if that meant you had to use your technological and tactical superiority in a preemptive use of locally organized violence, local law enforcement would understand. But the further the threat was pushed away from the backyards of the northeast political elite the easier it was for them to legislate a conscience.



Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Saturday, February 03, 2007

A lefty becomes victim of SMACKDOWN!!

This article steamed me the other day. Not to be outdone by the 900 responses, mostly against, his first drivel attracted, he decided to wade into the part of the pool he peed in again.

A soldier responds:


Old War Dogs: WaPo Weasels II

"Want to slam our soldiers, Arkin?
Well here is one to slam.
I got used to Lefty slamming
When I came back from Vietnam.
So you want to put a muzzle
On our brave fighting men?
Well try muzzling me you jerk,
Just tell me where and when."
Go read the rest. Brilliant!

HT: Michelle Malkin

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

On Cultural Marxism

I was reviewing some old comments and came across one of my off-the-cuff replies that led me to do a bit of Googling on memes related to cultural Marxism:

"The Marxists who started the push for a politically correct (thus stripped of meaning and ripe for the seeds of socialism) culture in the 1920's have intellectual allies today and many of them are neoconservatives building a GOP apparatchik that they can lord over. The John Podhoretz's of the world are counting on the world's fast pace and complexity making it likely that there will remain near majority of the electorate that remains only superficially informed, thus cognitively disconnected from the complexities of Corporatists' machinations.

Sometimes I wish I could just slide through life ignorant like many of my friends. It would be a far less painful existence to be free from the dread I have for my daughter's future. But I cannot be an ignoramus. My disdain for liars and obfuscators has cost me dearly in my career and in my relationships. But those things are ephemeral and I must put up with the occasional loss of position or friendship if it means that when I leave this earthly plane I will be comfortable in knowing I have done all I can to pass to my progeny the same great things that were placed in my care by birth. The increase in the number of not so clever argumentative methods in use by mass immigrationists is a good sign, a sign of desperation, I hope."

With that, I bring you a feature; perhaps I'll do it regularly. Perhaps I won't.

Cavalcade of Conservatism
Linked quotes to stuff you should read right now


"Again, until recently, anyone who questioned, however gently, multiculturalism or mass immigration was treated like a piece of dirt..."
"Disguising malignant intent behind code words such as multiculturalism, diversity, tolerance, safe schools/safe sex, same-sex marriage, ‘gay’ rights, choice, and peace, New Left revolutionaries began taking America and the West down the path to familial and cultural suicide".
"My point is: we became accustomed to being told that we must watch our terminology, and that we must change our vocabulary in order to accommodate or placate a group of people. The reason? Because they had been victims, and in fact, our ancestors were the victimizers".

"If language is used to assault Western culture, regaining control over it should constitute our first line of defense. We have a right to resist those who advocate our nation’s self-termination. A policy which deprives us of self-determination and maybe our children of self-preservation is evil, and we have not just a right, but a duty to oppose it, even if it is championed by our own government; in fact, especially then."

"Truth be told, cultural Marxism is now the "frame" (apologies to cultural Marxist George Lakoff) through which most apolitical Americans now see reality. Since much of the population does not vote, it's no stretch to say that cultural Marxism has almost achieved hegemony in the United States."

"If you’d like a preview of an American fascist state, look at higher education. If Hitlerism ever comes to America, it won’t be marching with crosses and Bibles, but mouthing the platitudes of multiculturalism (cultural Marxism), while goose-stepping to the beat of Sgt. Pelosi’s PC Band."


This is a war. It is a to-the-death struggle between those who properly seek to keep things certain about our Republic and those who would exchange it for something radically different, and certainly less "free." Arm yourself with knowledge; keep it locked and loaded.



Technorati tags: , , ,

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Sunday, January 28, 2007

One of These Things is Not Like The Others

One of these things just doesn't belong. Can you tell which thing is not like the others?

Class Assignment

1) Click on the first link.

2) Then read the story that brings us the moronic quote of the day:

Secrets of Obama family unlocked - World - Times Online

" 'I believe the American electorate is ready to support leaders who embody the American dream despite their differences. In doing so, we affirm ourselves as a tolerant people,' said William Galston, a senior fellow in public policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington."

3) Then click on the second link.

4) Select and read the biographical information about any 5 random presidents and make note of their heritage (that's a reference to his parents and ancestry, for those of you who are Democrats).

5) In 150 words or less, tell me how this guy ever gets elected President of the United States of America; if you use the term "racist," or "Nazi," you get an automatic "F" and are banished to the Godwin's Law closet forever.

If the origins of a candidate for President of the United States are somehow off-limits for discussion, then the nation is already too far gone. It cannot be saved from falling victim to whatever ideaology opposes it because it will no longer have any ideaology or moral absolutes of its own. While I believe we've been led down a radical and dangerous path by political correctness, multiculturalism, forced diversity and redefined "tolerance" for 40 years or so, I don't believe we've fallen to the point at which we'd elect someone president who represents the eradication of our traditions and our culture. The Hate AmericaTM crowd loves Obama primarily because he represents the antithesis of Americanism.

I hope the Dhimmicrats do nominate him. It will ensure a GOP victory in 2008, and likely a sweep of both Houses of Congress by true Conservatives. It will be the biggest-ever GOTV boost for those who oppose the dogma and semantics of cultural Marxism.


Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , , , ,

|

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

The State of Our Unraveling Union

Tonight, Jefedente Bush will deliver his seventh annual State of His Progress Toward Unraveling the Union Address. Unfortunately for America, he has sunk to such a pathetically low stature in the minds of even his loyal Conservative base that he can offer no plan on any substantial issue with a chance of getting traction in Congress; that is, except for his onerous immigration plan. It sickens me that the man truly believes that he will be doing right by future generations if he takes radical action to revise the ancestral foundations of our culture. And he's staking his legacy upon a plan the Democrats lust over because they know it will lead to perpetual domination by the left of our Federal Government as today's illegal alien criminals become tomorrow's most-government-dependent classes.

I have to hand it to stubborn son of a bitch. He has Faith....all of it misplaced. If you care about this nation's future and desire it to be a better place for your kids and descendants, then the things in which Bush has Faith should scare you:


  • He has Faith that adding 100 million people - becoming more than 20% of our population in my daughter's lifetime - from, mostly, a single-source alien culture will not radically alter or diminish ours.
  • He has Faith that Meztizos are as culturally compatible with us as a the Europeans who made up the vast majority of all American immigrants prior to 1970 and that they won't pose the long-term problems that our Hmong, Bantu and other exotic ethnic imports pose.
  • He has Faith that this nation will somehow become one with aliens we have not known through the ages despite our never having proved capable of assimilating large groups of newcomers who were not from folkways with which the majority of us and our ancestors could readily identify.
  • He has Faith in bureaucracy to manage a plan substantially larger and infinitely more more complex than the 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli reform, which up until now has been the most miserable bureaucratic failure since the programs of the Great Society.
  • He has Faith that the numbers of illegal aliens currently here are lower than feared by many reasonable people and that it won't be soon learned the number granted initial amnesty is to be double the officially projected numbers, as it became known after the passage of Simpson-Mazzoli.
  • He has Faith that his "No Foreign-Born Alien Left Behind" plan will not act as a magnet for additional waves of illegal aliens that will be larger and more desperate than this one.
  • He has Faith that when these amnestied criminals leverage "family reunification" laws to bring four or five times more people from the third world it will not bankrupt us or impact our middle class in any negative way.
  • He has Faith that creating a permanant cleft between citizens based on primary language preference will somehow enrich us, when history tells us that people that speak different languages cannot share a single culture...or a nation.
  • He has Faith that America's current ethnic majority will not react to the the threat of being displaced in the franchise by joining together into groups to promote their own ethnic agendas, nor will any of these groups promote radical agendas to restore what Bush so ignorantly threw away.
  • He has Faith that the anger sure to come, once it dawns on those who believed the spin, can be contained by political correctness and more blather about multiculturalism.

I've hardly scratched the surface with this. But I hope you, dear reader, get my point. I wish it were as simple as saying "we don't know what will happen if Bush gets his way on immigration." That wouldn't be half as bad as the truth. The truth is, we do know a lot about what will happen, and none of it is good for anyone on the right who isn't a corporatist desirous of instant financial gratification at the expense of the future. Nor is is good for anyone on the left who isn't politically motivated to create a permanent underclass of compliant, government-dependent serfs. Or is there something I don't understand about what happens when the nation with the largest per-capita carbon footprint grows by 25% in a single generation.

Have you noticed that Bush never talks about history, except when he is attempting to argue the validity of a logical fallacy? He only mentions the word assimilation in passing, but he is quick to mention the family values of our never-successful-at-republican-democracy neighbors to the south. If the family values of Mexico or Venezuela or Colombia are so compatible with ours, then why aren't they already living in nations and cultures with rich histories of stable liberty, like ours? If the family values of those with whom Bush wants to share our ancestral franchise, forever, are so admirable, then why aren't their nations doing so well that almost nobody wants to leave?

I've come to the conclusion that Bush either does not believe that there is a unique American culture, or does not believe that there should be a unique American culture. Either way, he must dislike something very fundamental about the ethnic majority or he would not be doing this to us.

With that, I'll leave you with one of the very first pieces I wrote for this web site, long before it had a blog:

Yes, there is a "unique American Culture"

Patriotic Americanism must continue to prevail over the desires of those who wish to deny that there is such a thing as "a unique American culture." Our ancestors anticipated attempts to lead our nation down a path to balkanization and expected us to stand fast against them. We must consistently refute lies that contend America was founded by and populated by people possessing broadly diverse perspectives and ideals. The ideas behind concepts like multiculturalism and diversity were anathema in the America of 1776 and for nearly 200 years thereafter.In their faith, habits and principles, the first American citizens were a most narrowly diverse lot, separated only by slight variations in Christian denomination. In their ethics, morals and values, the first Americans could only be described as virtually homogenous. It was the similarity not the diversity of our forefathers and founders that set the stage for America to become a great nation.

Those who advocate diversity and multiculturalism as being historically important to this nation's greatness are dangerously wrong. Using their twisted logic, we are to believe that the ideals driving Islamic terrorists to fly planes into buildings are societally compatible with the motivations that drive Presbyterian women to have fundraising bake sales. Diversity theory places Christian Baptism on par with Animist ritual mutilation of baby girls' genitalia. Diversity theory blindly accepts into our midst hordes of incompatible, poorly educated, virtually aliterate (if not outright alingual) illegal alien border-jumpers from third-world Kleptocracies because it is supposedly in keeping with "the things for which this nation stands." There is no doubt that our founders would be nauseated by such absurd notions.

Thomas Jefferson expressed concern about this issue in "Notes
on Virginia" (brackets added for clarity):

"…But are there no inconveniences to be thrown into the scale against the advantage expected from a multiplication of numbers by the importation of foreigners? It is for the happiness of those united in society to harmonize as much as possible in matters which they must of necessity transact together. Civil government being the sole object of forming societies, its administration must be conducted by common consent.Every species of government has its specific principles. Ours perhaps are more peculiar than those of any other in the universe. It is a composition of the freest principles of the English constitution, with others derived from natural right and natural reason. To these nothing can be more opposed than the maxims of absolute monarchies [the equivalent of today's despots, tyrants and kleptocrats]. yet, from such, we are to expect the greatest number of emigrants. They will bring with them the principles of the governments they leave, imbibed in their early youth; or, if able to throw them off, it will be in exchange for an unbounded licentiousness, passing, as is usual, from one extreme to another. It would be a miracle were they to stop precisely at the point of temperate liberty. These principles, with their language, they will transmit to their children. In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass."

Jefferson chafed at the thought that we could, by inaction, surrender our homogeneity and he was greatly concerned that we might! All this banter about diversity and multiculturalism would have given him fits.

Nothing exemplifies how far we have strayed from the intentions and dreams of our founders more clearly than our current immigration policy. Yes, immigration is an important part of our history. But nobody from the pro-immigration camp wants to discuss the fact that the none of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were immigrants, they were colonist and British subjects. Every member of the Constitutional Convention of 1789 except Alexander Hamilton was born in the colonies. The absolute truth is that the vast majority of our first citizens were Americans by birth and the vast majority of Americans have always been "citizens by birth." We have never had as many as 15 percent of our residents being of foreign origin.

Cast in this proper light, the "nation of immigrants" mantra to which we are constantly subjected becomes tritely idiomatic. If we are to be strictly precise, our history is one forged by colonists who became the first American citizens via revolution. These originals were augmented by immigrants who were eager assimilants: All Americans. Before and until the immigration reforms of 1965, between one quarter and one third of all migrants to this land could not adapt and ended up leaving. Those who came here "seeking a better life" without possessing the all-important corollary "dream of becoming American" were roughly cast aside by a society that was decidedly intolerant of selfish opportunists who didn't want to "get with the program." Promoting diversity for the sake of diversity is as accepting of malignancies as it is of the benign; it will always be an utterly stupid practice.

The only way in which we can assure America's long-term continued success as a sovereign nation is to establish new policies promoting American cultural homogeneity via imposing strict limits on the number of immigrants, demanding rigorously-enforced visa and border laws and insisting that all new arrivals submit to and successfully complete compulsory "patriotic assimilation" courses soon after their arrival. Those who cannot accept our unique culture, mores and values as their own, forsaking all others, should be summarily returned to their countries of origin.


Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Human nature surprises the New York Times

Hmmm. Curious stuff. I get the sense that the New York Times had a lot of trouble writing this article. It's as if they didn't see this stuff coming and are now perplexed as to why it is happening. All hail diversity!


Racial Hate Feeds a Gang War’s Senseless Killing

"Our cultural and ethnic diversity are cornerstones of a strong L.A.," the mayor [Antonio R. Villaraigosa] said Friday, "and violent crime motivated by the victim's skin color will not be tolerated."

Earl Ofari Hutchinson, an African-American syndicated columnist who plays host to the Los Angeles Urban Policy Roundtable, a weekly gathering in the Leimert Park neighborhood of South Los Angeles, said blacks complained that illegal Latin American immigrants were stealing jobs. Latinos, particularly newcomers unaccustomed to living among large numbers of African-Americans, in turn accuse blacks of criminal activity and harassing them.

"I think L.A. is a microcosm of what could happen in big cities in the future," Mr. Hutchinson said. "When we have the kind of tension you see in L.A. in the schools, the workplace and now hate-crime violence, my great concern is this is a horrific view of what could happen in other cities."

I'm amused at the non-sequitur nature of Villaraigosa's comment, especially as it is juxtaposed with Mr. Hutchinsons warning to America's big cities.

I'll ask again: What is it about mass-immigration that is supposed to "enrich" us? It really is sad that my rather dim view of human nature is so constantly and explicitly confirmed.

Technorati tags:
, , , , ,

Labels: , , ,

|

Sunday, January 14, 2007

How obvious are the agendas here?

Twelve occupants. Seven dead. Politically correct reporting. It would have been reported the same disingenuous way had they hit another van carrying a family of American citizens - no matter how many citizens were killed. And I'll bet anyone dollars to doughnuts that this was a van full of illegal aliens:
7 die as minivan hits big rig in Okla.
The identities of the victims were not immediately released. Philippi said all the van's occupants were residents of Mexico.

Let me take this a step further now. Those five who were not killed are now taking money out of our pockets. We're all paying for their care. No matter how long it takes. No matter how much it costs. We're all stuck with the bill. The agenda is to make sure we don't notice.

On another front, there is some great news:

Success! Illegal alien cop-killer in US custody
In the pre-dawn hours Thursday morning, US deputy marshals and agents of Mexico's Agencia Federal de Investigationes (AFI) delivered fugitive murderer Jorge Arroyo-Garcia to the Orange County California jail in Santa Ana.

Garcia is a vicious fugitive wanted for the murder of Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff David March four years ago. Garcia was flown from Mexico City to Tijuana late Wednesday night, where the Marshals and AFI agents turned him over to Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Investigators.
Here, I think, the agenda is more subtle. It's great that a scumbag is going to face trial for killing a cop. But I have to say that when I first read this I was more than a bit surprised. Mexico does not ever -NEVER- extradites anyone who might face the death penalty.

Why the sudden change? Why in this case? Could it be that Mexico is working with the open borders goon squad (McCain, Bush, Kennedy) on another McAmnesty? Perhaps they believe their episodic enforcement shows will lessen the outrage over lax immigration enforcement in the minds of a few more citizens? Does this arrest and extradition pony-show work in concert with the Swift Meat raids? Are little tidbits of news re-casting illegal aliens as less of a problem aimed at conning the more gullible among us? Will the made-up-news make some worry less about whether government is capable of managing a new program to document and track 20 million amnestied "guest workers?" Will the "good news" continue to dribble out while Congresscritters deal an incurable blow to the middle class and a rape the hopes and dreams of future generations? Will this raise hope amongst Corporatist disciples of economism and trigger more dollars to flow from the accounts of US Chamber of Commerce members into campaign accounts? Does the possible fulfillment of hope for the most greedy, and least concerned for sovereignty, that the greatest con in the history this American Nation's government will finally be perpetrated for their benefit?

Will the media play along by failing to report the crimes and costs of illegal aliens as evidenced by the minivan vs. big-rig story?
You betcha!

There aren't enough asshats to go around on this one. The ruse mirrors exactly what I'd do were I in charge of marketing amnesty to a public that proves mostly ignorant to the details but has shown a gut-level antipathy for amnesty. I'd put on a show targeted at weakening the resolve of those who don't have the time to pay close attention.

Do ya think I've grown too cynical?


Technorati tags: , , , , ,, , ,

Labels: , , , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

My heart refuses to bleed for criminals

It appears that Swift & Co's actions before the recent raids actually allowed the escape of 400 or so of those who had not only entered our nation illegally, but also had stolen and were using the identities of American citizens. Swift did everything it could to stop the raids from happening, even though it had months to clean up its act.

According to Swift: "These actions by ICE, or a comparable mass removal action,would have a direct impact on many legal workers, as well as suspected illegal workers, and would irreparably harm Swift by interfering with its legal business operations and by damaging its reputation."

I'm not moved at all by Swift's pleas.

The Department of Justice countered: "Put simply, there is no constitutional or statutory right for anyone to continue violating the law, and the government need not work on a potential law violators' timetable, especially where, as here, doing so would undermine legitimate law-enforcement operations."

I agree with the Department of Justice, but remain unconvinced that this action is anything but a smarmy feigning of interest in enforcement to give Congresscritters cover prior to their passing a massive amnesty that promises...PROMISES...to do irrevocable harm in its alteration of the character of this nation. The irony here is that if there is an amnesty now, considering the number of illegal aliens is at least double the number claimed by government, America's majority will finally learn out how onerously it has been duped. I foresee then end of the two-party system. Those who dream and idealize diversity and multiculturalism will probably get it.

And they're in for the shock of their lives when they find out they've led us all down the primrose path to a fractured, balkanized nation. Don't believe me? Then consider the following video, if you can stomach the Tribune's obviously wretched bias and appeal to emotion. Please pay attention early on to what some of the Mexicans who weren't arrested say in regard to this nation's sovereignty:

This sort of raid needs to happen somewhere in America every day for the next 10 years. Pick up a few hundred here, a couple dozen there, the occasional large cache of the worst of the worst and start perp-walking some of these corporate heads for good measure...problem solved. And maybe, just maybe, we'll piss off enough of those on the loony left who actually want these people to be amnestied that some of them will leave too.

Now THAT would be cause for celebration.

Technorati tags: , , , , , ,, , ,

PS: Let's all note that representatives of the Catholic Church again show up to stand in the corner of those who deny our status as a sovereign nation. Not that there's anything for them to gain by erasing our borders. No. Nothing to see here. Move along. Ignore the man in the collar with the rosary and an agenda.

Sheesh.

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Saturday, December 16, 2006

The best speech Bush never gave

I'm not even going to comment, but I'd appreciate learning what my readers think about this:





Technorati tags: ,

Labels: , ,

|

Thursday, December 14, 2006

If it walks like a duck...

A brief history:


  • November 19 - Congressman Tom Tancredo says in an interview with WorldNet Daily, "Look at what has happened to Miami. It has become a Third World country."
  • November 27 - Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen objected and extended an invitation to Congressman Tancredo to visit Miami saying, "come on down, Tom, the water's fine."
  • November 29 - Florida Governor Jeb Bush replies, "Miami is a wonderful city filled with diversity and heritage that we choose to celebrate, not insult.''
  • November 29 - Tancredo replies, "I certainly understand and appreciate your need and desire to try and create the illusion of Miami as a multiethnic 'All American' city. Indeed sir, one of us is naive."
  • December 12 - It is announced that Tancredo, taking up Bush and Ros-Lehtinen on their offer, will speak at the December 14 Rotary Club of Miami meeting about "Renewing America: The Need for Assimilation."
  • December 13 - The Rusty Pelician Restaurant cancels the Rotary meetings apparently after bomb and death threats were called into the Miami Herald and after the restaurant's staff balked at working at an event where Tancredo would be speaking.
  • December 13 - Scientists reiterate that animals that look like ducks, walk like ducks, crap like ducks and have duck DNA are, in fact, ducks.
  • December 13 - Tancredo spokesman Carlos Espinosa backs up the scientists with our December 14 quote of the day:

DenverPost.com - Tancredo's Miami speech canceled

"What says Third World Country more than a bomb threat at a speech by a politician?"

It cannot be said any better, folks!


Technorati tags: , , , ,, ,

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Saturday, December 09, 2006

"Go Back To Europe, White Man"

A big HT to FreedomFolks

Please watch:



Here's the deal: There are a lot more like him in our midst, folks. And El Presidente Jefe Bush and his merry band of corporatist and leftists, accidentally allied in their support for mass immigration, have no concern for what their open borders plans will do (and even less concern for what they might do) to the prospects of this nation remaining in the first world for future generations of Americans. They would have the majority replaced by more compliant, government-dependent serfs who historically have shown no commitment to individual liberty. Those of us who understand our rights and obligations as citizens are deemed too difficult to deal with by those holding keys to this evil alliance, so replacing us with serfs would be logically preferable.

If you want to know what things would look like if the south had won the civil war, you can see a fairly reasonable facsimilie if you look to the shadow leadership that is managed by influence peddlers on the far left and "free trade trumps all" disciples of economism on the right. The only substantial difference between the importation of slaves and the importation of illegal alien...or amnestied...or guest worker...serfs is that eventually the latter three will gain the franchise in far greater numbers. As their vote begins to form a substantial plurality, they will transmogrify and warp the direction of government. They will give their new overlords more power in exchange for unfettered access to the big nanny state feeding teat, and eventually they will overwhelm our heritage.

I'm committed to stopping the realization of reconquista visions of some horrific post-American America as espoused so succinctly by the bastard in this video. I can only hope, and pray, that there are still enough real Americans left; that is, those who know, have learned, still remember and still believe that our founders intended for this nation to be conservative in its approach to change. The wholesale radicalization of our underpinnings via the continuation of this 40- year mass immigration debacle cannot continue. Those who have come illegally should be compelled via strict enforcement to leave, and those who refuse to go of their own accord should be dealt with most harshly: There should be gigantic catapults stationed at the border and used to send people like the guy in the video back to Mexico.

Technorati tags: ,,,, , , ,

(I'm only kidding about the catapults...or am I?)

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Monday, November 20, 2006

Fisking points: Hispanics (supposedly) react to GOP 's being mean

Last Sunday there was a "news" story in the St. Pete Times (Florida's second most liberal paper after the Palm Beach Post) that reads much more like an Op-Ed aimed at putting fear in the minds of all non-Hispanic Conservatives than it reads "news." This is just another example of a key tactic being employed throughout the MSM and the Corporatist wing of the GOP. It is nothing but a thinly-veiled attempt to use political correctness as a tool for silencing those of us who are opposed to our nation being picked apart by "multiculturalism" much like and expensive car parked overnight in a bad neighborhood will surely be less of a car by morning.


Make no mistake about it, many of our supposedly Conservative "leaders" along with their leftist-elite de facto conspirators are hell bent on performing the societal equivalent of broken windows experiments upon us. They're hoping we won't notice that a byproduct of their need for cheap labor or desire for creating new, compliant voting blocs will surely be the wholesale transformation of our culture, and with it will come the destruction ofthe very things that made and have kept us a great nation.


Let's take a look inside the mind of a couple of clueless reporters, Jose Cardenas and Adam Smith:


Hispanic voter shift: anomaly or new rule?

"Here's something Florida Republicans a year ago never dreamed possible: a Democrat representing heavily Republican Little Havana in the state House.

Of course they wouldn't have dreamed it. Now, why don't our intrepid reporters tell us right away how the demographics have shifted in that barrio? Folks, here's a hint: "Little Havana" isn't majority Cuban anymore. Every day it becomes more and more of a hodge-podge slum made up of various lower-class, government-dependent imports from Central and South America, the very sort of imports that, once they access our franchise, will vote consistently Democrat. These newspaper shills are counting on readers to grow tired of the story and stop reading. They start by claiming the Little Havana is a GOP stronghold and end by pointing out that it isn't.
But that's precisely what happened on Election Day, as Democrats in Florida and across the country gained ground among Hispanic voters. If the trend continues, it could have far-reaching political implications.

No it isn't "precisely what happened." Far from it. Toward the end of this article, there are hints that the reporters understand what went on, but just don't get around to reporting it. It would not help them advance "the cause" they favor; that is, the cause of mass immigration. They never get around to pointing out clearly that actual turnout data indicates that for the first time since the Reagan revolution GOP turnout was depressed across the board. The election had no far reaching political implications unless all GOP turnout has been permanently affected. That's highly unlikely.



On Election Day, for the first time since 1976 - when Jimmy Carter got at least half of the Hispanic vote here - the Democratic candidate on the ballot's biggest race got at least an equal share of their vote as the Republican, said Sergio Bendixen, a Democratic pollster in Miami.

Let's all just ignore the fact that the "equal share" was an historically unrepresentative one.


Democrat Jim Davis and Republican Charlie Crist each got 49 percent of the Hispanic vote, according to television network exit polls.

Exit polls are notoriously irrelevant. With the growing influence of absentee and early voters on election outcomes, polling people on election day, particularly as they leave polling locations, captures an ever-decreasing part of the whole picture.


"We now believe we are in a position to be much more aggressively competitive within the Hispanic community as a result of this success," said Luis Navarro,executive director of the Florida Democratic Party.

Now, would we expect him to say anything else?

Another exit poll by the nonpartisan William C. Velasquez Institute found that Davis received 53 percent of the Hispanic vote and Crist received 42 percent. The poll also indicated that two-thirds of Hispanic voters cast ballots for Democrats in their congressional races.

This is misleading on two counts: 1) It fails to note that one fifth of Florida's registered voters' Congressional intentions went uncounted because their Congressman was unchallenged in the general election; and 2) the reporters don't point out that the William C. Velasquez Institute is a race-baiting, pro-Hispanic, reconquista front group.
"The question is whether this is a trend or is it a reaction in '06 to A) the immigration issue or B) the anti-Republican feeling nationwide," said the institute's Alvaro Fernandez.

My question for Mr. Alvarez is: How important is finding results that skew your way to the prospects for your next Paycheck?


Nowhere was the swing for Democrats more evident than in Miami-Dade County,where Democrat Luis Garcia was elected to the state House in a district that includes Little Havana and that historically has been dominated by Republicans.

Here is presented a new version of the "Prop 187 killed the GOP in California" false meme. In California, the non-Latino white middle and upper middle classes have been fleeing since the court ruled - in declaring Prop 187 unconstitutional - they must bear the disproportionate burden of public service costs for illegal aliens and their misbegotten anchor babies.

The original Cubans in Little Havana are being replaced by lower class recent balseros and other low-skilled, low-wage social burdens we've imported from the Southern Hemisphere. It's going to elect Democrats from here on out. Hialeah has had a Democrat mayor for what, 20 years? Fact errors and omissions like this would have earned me an instant "F" in my college journalism courses.


Like Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who is married to a Mexican immigrant and speaks Spanish, President Bush has made Hispanic voters a priority.

Bush got about 40 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2004. But exit polls last week showed that Republican candidates for the House of Representatives received only about 30 percent of the vote, while Democratic candidates got 69 percent.


These guys just don't get it that they're not comparing mangos to mangos. Never mind that that they're trying to read tea leaves grown in a banana republic where nothing makes sense to those in possession of American sensibilities anyway.


This week President Bush named Florida Sen. Mel Martinez general chairman of the Republican Party, a move seen by both Republicans and Democrats as an attempt to woo Hispanic voters back.

Woo them back? Let's examine what that really means: If we're generous and grant that Martinez at the helm of the GOP means a 5% bump in the Hispanic vote, and conservatively estimate that in the process he jettisons