Happy Socialist, Anarchist, Illegal Alien Day

I'm not going to get a chance to post much on this new day of arrogance. I've let my U.S. Senator from Cuba know I loathe him. I've ranted to a few friends who still don't see the threat that the interlopers pose to their children, and I wrote one comment on a blog.

That's what I'm copying over here. First, I'll repost the original pabulum:

howl

Count my voice among those who are today marching and asking for a path to citizenship for immigrants in this country. Look, I know they broke the law by coming here (I won't even get into how suspect it is for countries to set their own laws on immigration and expect citizens of another country to just follow them), but what right do we have to demand that they not enter our borders? For all America is doing wrong, it is still the most free country in the world and the one most able to provide a good life for its inhabitants. How can we expect people to not come to this country if we can offer them such a better life than the one they have in other countries? How can we, and especially myself and other Christians, tell people to not come to us even though we can help them? Since when is the saying on the Statue of Liberty about "bring me your huddled masses..." a epithet without meaning?

Too often we americans forget that our history is, in certain areas, largely one of breaking laws and theft and questionable citizenship. We stole land from the indians and just arbitrarily said it was ours; it's not like we Americans were the first ones on the scene here. We fought wars to gain our own independence because we believed that America could hold a better life. We welcomed immigrants from Europe from the thousands, laying the groundwork for the America we have today with our rich differing cultures and dialects and traditions. We are not a nation of indigenous peoples. We are a nation built on a history of huddled masses, immigrants, poverty-stricken farmers, religious freedom-seekers, soldiers, land-grabbers, and dreamers.

How can we deny anyone else in this whole world the same thing? Happy May Day, everyone.

Posted by Brother Joshua at 2:46:00 PM

There was just so much here that needs to be beaten, physically, from the squalid ideations that infest the minds of so many who feel that they must kowtow to all others from all nations in order to feel good about being American. The guy made my skin crawl with his matter-of-fact lunaticity. So, I replied thusly:

Katie's Dad said...

When Emma Lazarus rises from the dead and proves she was a founding father, not some PR-Stunt poetry contest winner, then I might have a thimble of compassion for an illegal alien. But probably not then, either. For she was nothing more than a foil for a newspaperman's quest for profit. No figure in American history is more over-promoted. It's just sick to base policy that determines who we are, and what sort of fate-in-nation awaits our ancestors, upon that blithering tripe of a poem. Really.

Being romantically distracted by baseless ideals while deadly serious issues like sovereignty and societal cohesiveness are at stake is the epitome of stupidity.

Instead, I'm informed by Thomas Jefferson who wrote:"In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass."

George Washington said, prescriptively: "Citizens, by birth or choice, of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles."

John Jay wrote, also prescriptively: "I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people -- a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.

"This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties."

As a Christian, you'd be better served by thinking about the plight of the people these interloping opportunists leave behind; the poverty they exacerbate back home; the broken families; the elderly with no youth to support them in a a community; the tacit support your compassion gives to despots who are relieved to see the departure of those who are most physically able to threaten their corrupt status quo; and, most importantly, the detrimental impact upon the futures of America's children that such an unprecedented influx surely portends. Do you ever think about that stuff? Or has the romanticism for the "needy other" completely made you blind to
the needs and best interests of your own?

Is it OK if one in five of our residents has no connection to, empathy for or sense of stewardship on behalf of those who fought and bled and died to start this grand experiment? Even if that assures that heritage is erased? And even if the loss of that heritage puts an end to the experiment?

If so, please send your kids to schools built in the shadow of your new Tower of Babel; but, please, make provisions for mine to go to schools in which english is the only language allowed to be spoken. While you're at it, give my little girl a place to grow up in which this nation's sense of Providence is allowed to thrive without being held hostage to the influence of those who would sell it all out on a whim.

I was tempted to beat the author up over his asinine "we stole the land from the indians" crap, but I figured he'd not be able to digest any additional de-programming thoughts in one post.

Technorati tags: illegal immigration, illegal alien, amnesty, immigration reform, immigration, employer sanctions, reconquista, MALDEF, La Raza, sovereignty

Something Bush Won't Ask an Iowan

I'm still amazed at the gutters into which this this rat-bastard we've elected President will slither to pander to people who do not belong here in his unceasing effort to transmogrify the nation of my ancestors into a third-world cesspool. And here it is reported that he's found some new pond scum to fertilize:

Bush seeks grads' help on immigration - Yahoo! News

Bush gave the commencement address at Miami Dade College, where more than half the students were raised speaking a language other than English. He gave the Class of 2007 an assignment: Tell their elected representatives in Washington to get going on immigration legislation. "You see every day the values of hard work, and family, and faith that immigrants bring," the president said. "This experience gives you a special responsibility to make your voices heard." Bush said the immigration system is deeply broken: Employers are not held accountable enough; borders are not secure enough; businesses need workers willing to do low-paying jobs; and the 12 million people estimated to be in the U.S. illegally cannot all be deported and so must be dealt with "without amnesty and without animosity."

Obviously, this son of a bitch would never give such a speech to youth at a community college in Iowa! Why is he asking first-generation Americans, those who have a Cubanisimo-warped sense of nation and almost zero exposure to people who are descended from American patriots, to play a pivotal role in immigration reform? Why will he not ask the same of people who have a sense of American stewardship? And, as Jake correctly points out, why will he not lead us an open and honest debate among all citizens to be the means of deciding the solution - with all real options placed on the table?

(Hint: It would take "leadership" and he wouldn't get what he wants)

Here's another nagging question: Why does this prickish waste of the "conservative" mantle get a free pass from the media to mouth garbage like the " they cannot all be deported" fallacy when every other utterance of his gets picked apart like road-kill beset upon by vultures? God forbid the media ever call him on it and let news consumers know about the effectiveness of "attrition through enforcement."

President Bush, what the f**k makes the poorly-Americanized offspring of immigrants more special to you than my child? What you are saying to these graduates is that they have more value to you than children in my family who share my ancestry.

Mr. President, you make me sick.

Technorati tags: hispanic vote, illegal immigration, illegal alien, amnesty, immigration reform, immigration, conservatism

The Ultimate Goal of Tolerance: Self Extinction?

From Lawrence Auster's View from the Right, a commenter posits this gem:

Is the Islamic takeover of Europe inevitable?

In the end, I think things are going to get much, much worse before they get better, precisely because liberals refuse to accept the most common sense limitations on the principle of tolerance. They risk discrediting tolerance altogether by making it synonymous with self-extinction. An outpouring of hatred and violence is almost certain to erupt at some stage, since nowhere do people gladly suffer replacement of their own people civilization by that of others. A tipping point must eventually be reached, and when it does, the reaction could be spasmodic and bloody. This can easily be avoided, but liberals are determined to see this suicidal path through to the bitter end, such is their devotion to a program which I think even they suspect is daily darkening the future of mankind.

I'd not considered the end game that comes part and parcel with today's politically-correct definition of the word tolerance. While I have to ponder it a bit, my initial thought is that this is probably true. While the post thread from which this comes is in regard to the Islamification of Europe, I think it equally applicable to the United States.


Technorati tags: tolerance

Core Principles: Duty to our similars and our families

Today, I'm passing on a quote of mine from Jake's comments in response to a post about the Heritage Foundation's latest findings about the costs we all bear thanks to illegal aliensa and their enablers:

It's unconscionable that we have American kids being shortchanged by schools beset by the challenges imposed upon them by increasing numbers of illegal aliens. Perhaps the most lamentable travesties occur every time an American child is denied the opportunity to achieve the best results that his or her abilities might allow because the children of alien criminals forced costs shifts or social discordance in a public school.

How many American children must have their lives permanently altered for the worse before their plight starts to matter to those who misplace their compassion only with interlopers while ignoring the needs and futures of our native sons and daughters?

For me, this gets to the crux of the matter of both illegal and mass immigration. I believe that those who promote the mass movement of cheap labor and demand amnesty for huge masses of foreigners do so for reasons that have nothing to do with the best interests of today's American children or its future generations. Coincidentally, while human nature holds imperative the need for us to place our families, tribes and familiars first, we see similar self-defeating movements taking root in every nation that is a part of Western Civilization.

Why is this bizarre form of self-destruction not happening to any other set of brethren cultures on earth? Is the "white man's burden" so toxic that it demands our own end?

It takes an incredible amount of greed, ignorance and calculated misindoctrination of those susceptible for such a culturally-immolating set of ideas to become established and considered normal in common discourse. As I see it, these efforts to supplant the peoples of Western Civilization with people erroneously assumed to be "more compliant" to the desires of ruling elites are the most conspicuous evils ever perpetrated by groups of people against their similars and families.

I'd rather not think it of my fellow man, but can it really be that people raised in the crucible of liberty have become mere inconvenient obstacles to instant profit gratification now that elites have discovered that willing dupes are available for import?

Technorati tags: Western Civilization

Demographers Bassackward

This is laughable:

Census: Immigration helps big metros - 04/05/2007 - MiamiHerald.com

"Immigrants are filling the void as domestic migrants are seeking opportunities in other places," said Mark Mather, a demographer at the Population Reference Bureau, a private research organization.

Might it ever occur to demographers that a big reason for the "void" is the characteristic "otherness" of the very influx of immigrants they suggest that cities need? Here, and in most current dialog regarding immigrants and cities in America, demographic cause and effect are presented as ass-backwards as possible by "experts."

For a counter-example, here is my own experience: I truly loved my hometown while growing up and as a young adult in S. Florida as it morphed from a small city into part of a vital coastal megalopolis. But in recent years, thanks to bad immigration policy and lax enforcement of law, the character and culture of the growth factors took a turn for the worse. My family and I came to view the large foreign-born population infusion as not a healthy or neighborly benefit at all; rather, we learned it presented contrary belief system wedges that frequently made us uncomfortable in our own home. When culture, language and heritage are first challenged by others in a subtle manner and eventually overtly denigrated by ungrateful "wretched refuse," something has to give.

And in our case, it was us who gave in and fled. The rapid demographic shift fomented such a cultural arrogance on the part of the newcomers that living there became intolerable. Our reaction to mass immigration is not unique, it is prevalent and growing.

It only takes quick a look through my old MS Outlook contacts and retired Rolodex cards to see the obvious: I held out hope for my former home a lot longer than most of my high school classmates, college friends and former business associates. The exodus of my social and business cohort from South Florida was caused by the "otherness" of alien immigrants and our correct perception of their disrespect for our way of life, and that of our ancestors. Now our replacement population shows every intention of remaining allegiant-in-diaspora to their former homelands through the generations.

I'd like to tell the demographers where they can stick their asinine assumptions.

The article continues:

Advocates for stricter immigration laws question whether a stable, or even a shrinking population, is bad.

"Don't we have concerns about congestion and sprawl and pollution?" asked Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for stricter immigration policies.

"Maybe those metro areas should think about what it would take to make Americans want to live there," Camarota said.

If only our leaders understood that this last point is far more important to cities' health than importing cheap labor that spurs the rancor that accompanies diversity and multiculturalism. I suppose the onerous aspects of mass immigration are felt more keenly by those of us who were raised to believe, correctly, that a nation exists to promote and strengthen its culture; that is has a duty to honor ancestral legacy; and that it carries a prescription for a pathway to assure that there remains a birthright legacy for future generations to cherish.

It is traditional Conservative impulses that lead people to flee cities inflicted with the results of the mass-immigrationist mentality, regardless of the evacuees' political persuasion. The unwelcomed replacement of Americans in metropolis should serve as a forewarning that all is not well with the status quo.

Screw political correctness. This invasion must end.


Technorati tags: white flight

A Troll Gets His Due

I've been following, and participating, in a tit-for-tat with a troll who has taken up residence at FreedomFolks using the nom-de-keyboard "hannitized." He's not really worthy of the level of respect I usually demand to bring up such lunacy; he ran away from this blog's comment section after I made it clear that he would not be allowed to post non-sequitur and/or nonsensical Leftist links to make his feeble points. I'll not be a party to driving traffic, and its related profit, to the DailyKos or Indymedia crowd. The only reason I bring him up now is that this troll's comments serve as the archetype evil for anyone who is trying to make a point about the vital dangers of multiculturalism, the cultural emptiness of diversity, and the inescapable primacy of tribal instinct - hard-coded into human nature - that makes promoting a too-heterogeneous society so horrifically wrong.

A couple of weeks ago, I decided that it was beneath my standards to address this quasi-sentient infestation directly at my friends' blog, so I began to comment on his comments in the third person. I also assumed a mocking tone and made every effort to find a more appropriate moniker for him. Eventually, I settled on "hispandertized" because it best described his position on most things: He's got a monumental inferiority complex that exhibits itself in puffed-up "my people are superior to your people, but your people STOLE OUR LANDS and made us less great than we ought to be" attitude. Every time another "American-by-technicality" is born into a family like that which begat this hispantertized pathogen, there is made another weak link in the chain that binds Americans together.

We are made less when such trolls have sex, except with themselves.

What's most laughable, and sad, about Jake's week-kneed little parasite is that he really doesn't know to what tribe he belongs. Sometimes he's a Spaniard, sometimes he's an indigenous Mexica, sometimes he's a Native American. But never, no never, is he an American - even though ours is the nation to which he was born, and he probably would swear to which he remains allegiant. But his rantings betray him. He hates America. He hates it's origins. He hates anything that might be a byproduct of Western Civilization's success especially if its origin is even tangentially Anglo Saxon.

But he loves all things Mexican.

Mexico's indigenous tribes can do no wrong in his book. America would be best served if that third-world nation's people could freely retake the lands America won, then purchased 150 years ago. To him, the "indigenous peoples" still own it depite the fact that the mythical lands of Atzlan were Mexican territory for barely a quarter-century before America fought and won them in a war. Most of us know that reconquista is not a salient point of view for a true American; however, it is an unwavering belief for most Mexicans.

Hispandertized is walking, talking proof that some tribes just will never assimilate fully to the American way. The longer we allow the alien invasion, particularly from our south, to proceed at such breakneck pace, the harder it will be for this nation to remain unified throughout its next generations. I have to thank this troll for being exemplar of how foolishly wrong the notion that "all peoples are compatible with American ideals" really is.

Seeing that hispandertized lives to browbeat us with the wonders and moral superiority of the indegnous people's of Mexico, I thought I'd close with an brilliant example of those "wonders."

Enjoy:

Mordida, Bribes - Some Things in Mexico Seem To Never Change

In Chiapas, the Chamula Indians obligate their tribesmen to be members of the ruling PRI party. Anyone in the tribe who prefers membership in a different party or even criticizes the PRI is ostracized and driven from their tribal lands. The PRI maintains this loyalty by providing the Chamulas with the Coca Cola franchise for the region. Big time mordida.

When creatures like hispandertized call me a "racist," it's confirmation that I'm correct in my analysis of the alien invasion. How ironic is it that he cannot acknowledge the tribal preference for one's own kind that motivates him! Only someone filled with equal parts hate for his nation and self-loathing would invade someone else's Internet domain, build a soapbox there and do nothing but berate the virtual townsfolk who happen by.

Technorati tags: illegal immigration, illegal alien, immigration reform, immigration, employer sanctions, reconquista, diversity, multiculturalism, reconquista

Orwell Lives In UK!

I'll presume he's not eating at McDonalds so as not to upset Prince Charles and his showhound, Camilla.

Saying 'bloody foreigner' is ruled racist Uk News News Telegraph
Law Lords have ruled that calling someone a "bloody foreigner" and saying "get back to your own country" can amount to racial abuse.

This is from the land of "thought crime." The politically correct religiously secular left must clip headlines like this for their collages. Surely it's a papier mache and Elmer's glue night somewhere because of this!

Technorati tags: Secular Left

Revisting the Evils of the Anti-Racists

For the past few days I've been parrying with a decidedly inferiority-complex-bound intellect (I use the term loosely) in the comments section over at FreedomFolks who is openly determined to promote unfettered mass immigration as a penance for the evils of his ancestors. I've rarely come across someone so consumed by self-loathing in the 13 years I've been posting stuff on the Internet; today, the insistent little gnat came out of the closet and revealed his guilt for having Spanish, Italian and "Native American" blood. It appears he believes he must make amends with the "Indian" part of himself for the things that his Spaniard ancestors did. It all would be comical and laughable if his premise were not so pathetic, and his desire to take the nation down with him so virulent. I guess his being miserable about the combination of genes with which he was born isn't enough, he has to make us share his despair.

No thanks.

As is the case with all discussions in which a leftist is the antagonist, the time is fast approaching in which we can all invoke Godwin's Law and be done with him. He's already devolved into calling racist anyone who disagrees with his assessment that this nation is evil and must make amends for every wrong he perceives it has ever done by allowing ourselves to be over-run by the denizens of the third world. Right now, he's stuck on ad-hominems about our being bigoted for even thinking that this nation has a culture we should be concerned about keeping. Such is the plight of the anti-racist: He cannot see that he has become the reverse-actualization of the very figment-evil he decries.

All of this got me to thinking about a long ago post in which I agreed with Jim Kalb's assessment of the anti-racists. Nearly two years after the fact, this page is one of the most read of all I've ever posted here. And I think it's time that I bring Kalb's work to the forefront again. After all, the time I wasted responding to guilt-ridden trolls has to be good for something, right?

Anti-racism -- Jim Kalb

Indeed, anti-racism requires anti-majority racism. An anti-racist ruling class must treat the majority as presumptively wrong. "Ingrained social stereotypes" -- the culture and habits of the majority -- must be discredited because their dominance puts minorities at a disadvantage. Since habits and culture are what make a people what it is, the things that make the majority a people must be attacked; the majority must be defined as racist, and therefore evil and unfit to rule or even exist. "Racist" has the same function today that "nigger" once did: it makes a man less than human and so unfit for self-government.

Attempts to abolish deeply rooted human tendencies are necessarily tyrannical; "rule by the people" is absurd when a government that loses confidence in the people can dissolve it and form a new one. Such attempts inevitably fail, and succeed only in destroying traditional restraints. Attempts in Russia to abolish the profit motive ended, after unparalleled brutality and massacre, in lawless greed and mafia rule. It is not clear why attempts to abolish ethnicity should be more successful.

Rather than attempt a utopian transformation of human nature, it seems better to accept the distinctions men find important, and let them deal with them in customary ways that make sense to those involved; abuses and extreme cases can be dealt with as such. Things classified as racism -- ethnic loyalty and dominance -- are necessary features of social life. Something as closely related as ethnicity is to men's habits, attitudes and loyalties is plainly relevant to participation in a common effort like carrying on a business. The fact that men universally take ethnicity into account in choosing associates is the best possible evidence that it makes sense for them to do so.

For the last two years, I've lived in a rather mixed-ethnicity and mixed-race neighborhood. The student-of-human-nature part of me has been fascinated by the self-segregation that goes on here. Despite this being a very liberal and leftist college town, and despite my neighbors being predominately leftist in political persuasion, the strongest bonds I see growing in this most "utopian" for the multiculturalist setting, are between people who are of the same ethnicity and the same race. While we all exchange superficial pleasantries, the only times I have witnessed or participated in deep conversations about substantive issues, the participants have obvious ancient-tribal similarities. Heck, we even self-segregate our seating arrangements at our homeowners' association meetings. I notice this stuff and wonder who else sees the same things.

Technorati tags: anti-racism

You can go on believing all cutures are equal...

...but pardon me for thinking you're nuts.

WARNING

If you are squeamish, do not read further, and by all means don't click on the link and read more.

But if you do, I hope it gives you pause. If you believe that the Orwellian mantra "diversity is our strength" has even the smallest scintilla of truth, I feel sorry for you. You have been enslaved by the cult.

Cruellest cut in the name of Islam

Then the scissors went down between my legs and the man cut off my inner labia and clitoris. I heard it, like a butcher snipping the fat off a piece of meat. A piercing pain shot up between my legs, indescribable, and I howled. Then came the sewing: the long, blunt needle clumsily pushed into my bleeding outer labia, my loud and anguished protests, Grandma's words of comfort and encouragement. "It's just this once in your life, Ayaan. Be brave, he's almost finished." When the sewing was finished, the man cut the thread off with his teeth.

If you have a problem with my believing that a nation should have a predominate and dominating culture in order to survive, tough sh*t. If you want to experience the joy of learning about different cultures, please do so by traveling to distant lands, not by importing the toxic or even the exotic here. Imposing variety upon your neighbors because you think it will enrich them is not just un-neighborly, it's arrogantly evil.


Technorati tags: Islam, Islamism, political correctness, diversity, multiculturalism

On Cultural Marxism

I was reviewing some old comments and came across one of my off-the-cuff replies that led me to do a bit of Googling on memes related to cultural Marxism:

"The Marxists who started the push for a politically correct (thus stripped of meaning and ripe for the seeds of socialism) culture in the 1920's have intellectual allies today and many of them are neoconservatives building a GOP apparatchik that they can lord over. The John Podhoretz's of the world are counting on the world's fast pace and complexity making it likely that there will remain near majority of the electorate that remains only superficially informed, thus cognitively disconnected from the complexities of Corporatists' machinations.

Sometimes I wish I could just slide through life ignorant like many of my friends. It would be a far less painful existence to be free from the dread I have for my daughter's future. But I cannot be an ignoramus. My disdain for liars and obfuscators has cost me dearly in my career and in my relationships. But those things are ephemeral and I must put up with the occasional loss of position or friendship if it means that when I leave this earthly plane I will be comfortable in knowing I have done all I can to pass to my progeny the same great things that were placed in my care by birth. The increase in the number of not so clever argumentative methods in use by mass immigrationists is a good sign, a sign of desperation, I hope."

With that, I bring you a feature; perhaps I'll do it regularly. Perhaps I won't.

Cavalcade of Conservatism
Linked quotes to stuff you should read right now

"Again, until recently, anyone who questioned, however gently, multiculturalism or mass immigration was treated like a piece of dirt..."

"Disguising malignant intent behind code words such as multiculturalism, diversity, tolerance, safe schools/safe sex, same-sex marriage, ‘gay’ rights, choice, and peace, New Left revolutionaries began taking America and the West down the path to familial and cultural suicide".

"My point is: we became accustomed to being told that we must watch our terminology, and that we must change our vocabulary in order to accommodate or placate a group of people. The reason? Because they had been victims, and in fact, our ancestors were the victimizers".

"If language is used to assault Western culture, regaining control over it should constitute our first line of defense. We have a right to resist those who advocate our nation’s self-termination. A policy which deprives us of self-determination and maybe our children of self-preservation is evil, and we have not just a right, but a duty to oppose it, even if it is championed by our own government; in fact, especially then."

"Truth be told, cultural Marxism is now the "frame" (apologies to cultural Marxist George Lakoff) through which most apolitical Americans now see reality. Since much of the population does not vote, it's no stretch to say that cultural Marxism has almost achieved hegemony in the United States."

"If you’d like a preview of an American fascist state, look at higher education. If Hitlerism ever comes to America, it won’t be marching with crosses and Bibles, but mouthing the platitudes of multiculturalism (cultural Marxism), while goose-stepping to the beat of Sgt. Pelosi’s PC Band."

This is a war. It is a to-the-death struggle between those who properly seek to keep things certain about our Republic and those who would exchange it for something radically different, and certainly less "free." Arm yourself with knowledge; keep it locked and loaded.

Technorati tags: Cultural Marxism, political correctness, diversity, multiculturalism

One of These Things is Not Like The Others

One of these things just doesn't belong. Can you tell which thing is not like the others?

Class Assignment

1) Click on the first link.

2) Then read the story that brings us the moronic quote of the day:

Secrets of Obama family unlocked - World - Times Online

" 'I believe the American electorate is ready to support leaders who embody the American dream despite their differences. In doing so, we affirm ourselves as a tolerant people,' said William Galston, a senior fellow in public policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington."

3) Then click on the second link.

4) Select and read the biographical information about any 5 random presidents and make note of their heritage (that's a reference to his parents and ancestry, for those of you who are Democrats).

5) In 150 words or less, tell me how this guy ever gets elected President of the United States of America; if you use the term "racist," or "Nazi," you get an automatic "F" and are banished to the Godwin's Law closet forever.

If the origins of a candidate for President of the United States are somehow off-limits for discussion, then the nation is already too far gone. It cannot be saved from falling victim to whatever ideaology opposes it because it will no longer have any ideaology or moral absolutes of its own. While I believe we've been led down a radical and dangerous path by political correctness, multiculturalism, forced diversity and redefined "tolerance" for 40 years or so, I don't believe we've fallen to the point at which we'd elect someone president who represents the eradication of our traditions and our culture. The Hate America^TM crowd loves Obama primarily because he represents the antithesis of Americanism.

I hope the Dhimmicrats do nominate him. It will ensure a GOP victory in 2008, and likely a sweep of both Houses of Congress by true Conservatives. It will be the biggest-ever GOTV boost for those who oppose the dogma and semantics of cultural Marxism.


Technorati tags: Barack Obama

The State of Our Unraveling Union

Tonight, Jefedente Bush will deliver his seventh annual State of His Progress Toward Unraveling the Union Address. Unfortunately for America, he has sunk to such a pathetically low stature in the minds of even his loyal Conservative base that he can offer no plan on any substantial issue with a chance of getting traction in Congress; that is, except for his onerous immigration plan. It sickens me that the man truly believes that he will be doing right by future generations if he takes radical action to revise the ancestral foundations of our culture. And he's staking his legacy upon a plan the Democrats lust over because they know it will lead to perpetual domination by the left of our Federal Government as today's illegal alien criminals become tomorrow's most-government-dependent classes.

I have to hand it to stubborn son of a bitch. He has Faith....all of it misplaced. If you care about this nation's future and desire it to be a better place for your kids and descendants, then the things in which Bush has Faith should scare you:

• He has Faith that adding 100 million people - becoming more than 20% of our population in my daughter's lifetime - from, mostly, a single-source alien culture will not radically alter or diminish ours.
• He has Faith that Meztizos are as culturally compatible with us as a the Europeans who made up the vast majority of all American immigrants prior to 1970 and that they won't pose the long-term problems that our Hmong, Bantu and other exotic ethnic imports pose.
• He has Faith that this nation will somehow become one with aliens we have not known through the ages despite our never having proved capable of assimilating large groups of newcomers who were not from folkways with which the majority of us and our ancestors could readily identify.
• He has Faith in bureaucracy to manage a plan substantially larger and infinitely more more complex than the 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli reform, which up until now has been the most miserable bureaucratic failure since the programs of the Great Society.
• He has Faith that the numbers of illegal aliens currently here are lower than feared by many reasonable people and that it won't be soon learned the number granted initial amnesty is to be double the officially projected numbers, as it became known after the passage of Simpson-Mazzoli.
• He has Faith that his "No Foreign-Born Alien Left Behind" plan will not act as a magnet for additional waves of illegal aliens that will be larger and more desperate than this one.
• He has Faith that when these amnestied criminals leverage "family reunification" laws to bring four or five times more people from the third world it will not bankrupt us or impact our middle class in any negative way.
• He has Faith that creating a permanant cleft between citizens based on primary language preference will somehow enrich us, when history tells us that people that speak different languages cannot share a single culture...or a nation.
• He has Faith that America's current ethnic majority will not react to the the threat of being displaced in the franchise by joining together into groups to promote their own ethnic agendas, nor will any of these groups promote radical agendas to restore what Bush so ignorantly threw away.
• He has Faith that the anger sure to come, once it dawns on those who believed the spin, can be contained by political correctness and more blather about multiculturalism.

I've hardly scratched the surface with this. But I hope you, dear reader, get my point. I wish it were as simple as saying "we don't know what will happen if Bush gets his way on immigration." That wouldn't be half as bad as the truth. The truth is, we do know a lot about what will happen, and none of it is good for anyone on the right who isn't a corporatist desirous of instant financial gratification at the expense of the future. Nor is is good for anyone on the left who isn't politically motivated to create a permanent underclass of compliant, government-dependent serfs. Or is there something I don't understand about what happens when the nation with the largest per-capita carbon footprint grows by 25% in a single generation.

Have you noticed that Bush never talks about history, except when he is attempting to argue the validity of a logical fallacy? He only mentions the word assimilation in passing, but he is quick to mention the family values of our never-successful-at-republican-democracy neighbors to the south. If the family values of Mexico or Venezuela or Colombia are so compatible with ours, then why aren't they already living in nations and cultures with rich histories of stable liberty, like ours? If the family values of those with whom Bush wants to share our ancestral franchise, forever, are so admirable, then why aren't their nations doing so well that almost nobody wants to leave?

I've come to the conclusion that Bush either does not believe that there is a unique American culture, or does not believe that there should be a unique American culture. Either way, he must dislike something very fundamental about the ethnic majority or he would not be doing this to us.

With that, I'll leave you with one of the very first pieces I wrote for this web site, long before it had a blog:

Yes, there is a "unique American Culture"

Patriotic Americanism must continue to prevail over the desires of those who wish to deny that there is such a thing as "a unique American culture." Our ancestors anticipated attempts to lead our nation down a path to balkanization and expected us to stand fast against them. We must consistently refute lies that contend America was founded by and populated by people possessing broadly diverse perspectives and ideals. The ideas behind concepts like multiculturalism and diversity were anathema in the America of 1776 and for nearly 200 years thereafter.In their faith, habits and principles, the first American citizens were a most narrowly diverse lot, separated only by slight variations in Christian denomination. In their ethics, morals and values, the first Americans could only be described as virtually homogenous. It was the similarity not the diversity of our forefathers and founders that set the stage for America to become a great nation.

Those who advocate diversity and multiculturalism as being historically important to this nation's greatness are dangerously wrong. Using their twisted logic, we are to believe that the ideals driving Islamic terrorists to fly planes into buildings are societally compatible with the motivations that drive Presbyterian women to have fundraising bake sales. Diversity theory places Christian Baptism on par with Animist ritual mutilation of baby girls' genitalia. Diversity theory blindly accepts into our midst hordes of incompatible, poorly educated, virtually aliterate (if not outright alingual) illegal alien border-jumpers from third-world Kleptocracies because it is supposedly in keeping with "the things for which this nation stands." There is no doubt that our founders would be nauseated by such absurd notions.

Thomas Jefferson expressed concern about this issue in "Notes
on Virginia" (brackets added for clarity):

"…But are there no inconveniences to be thrown into the scale against the advantage expected from a multiplication of numbers by the importation of foreigners? It is for the happiness of those united in society to harmonize as much as possible in matters which they must of necessity transact together. Civil government being the sole object of forming societies, its administration must be conducted by common consent.Every species of government has its specific principles. Ours perhaps are more peculiar than those of any other in the universe. It is a composition of the freest principles of the English constitution, with others derived from natural right and natural reason. To these nothing can be more opposed than the maxims of absolute monarchies [the equivalent of today's despots, tyrants and kleptocrats]. yet, from such, we are to expect the greatest number of emigrants. They will bring with them the principles of the governments they leave, imbibed in their early youth; or, if able to throw them off, it will be in exchange for an unbounded licentiousness, passing, as is usual, from one extreme to another. It would be a miracle were they to stop precisely at the point of temperate liberty. These principles, with their language, they will transmit to their children. In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass."

Jefferson chafed at the thought that we could, by inaction, surrender our homogeneity and he was greatly concerned that we might! All this banter about diversity and multiculturalism would have given him fits.

Nothing exemplifies how far we have strayed from the intentions and dreams of our founders more clearly than our current immigration policy. Yes, immigration is an important part of our history. But nobody from the pro-immigration camp wants to discuss the fact that the none of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were immigrants, they were colonist and British subjects. Every member of the Constitutional Convention of 1789 except Alexander Hamilton was born in the colonies. The absolute truth is that the vast majority of our first citizens were Americans by birth and the vast majority of Americans have always been "citizens by birth." We have never had as many as 15 percent of our residents being of foreign origin.

Cast in this proper light, the "nation of immigrants" mantra to which we are constantly subjected becomes tritely idiomatic. If we are to be strictly precise, our history is one forged by colonists who became the first American citizens via revolution. These originals were augmented by immigrants who were eager assimilants: All Americans. Before and until the immigration reforms of 1965, between one quarter and one third of all migrants to this land could not adapt and ended up leaving. Those who came here "seeking a better life" without possessing the all-important corollary "dream of becoming American" were roughly cast aside by a society that was decidedly intolerant of selfish opportunists who didn't want to "get with the program." Promoting diversity for the sake of diversity is as accepting of malignancies as it is of the benign; it will always be an utterly stupid practice.

The only way in which we can assure America's long-term continued success as a sovereign nation is to establish new policies promoting American cultural homogeneity via imposing strict limits on the number of immigrants, demanding rigorously-enforced visa and border laws and insisting that all new arrivals submit to and successfully complete compulsory "patriotic assimilation" courses soon after their arrival. Those who cannot accept our unique culture, mores and values as their own, forsaking all others, should be summarily returned to their countries of origin.

Technorati tags: State of the Union

Human nature surprises the New York Times

Hmmm. Curious stuff. I get the sense that the New York Times had a lot of trouble writing this article. It's as if they didn't see this stuff coming and are now perplexed as to why it is happening. All hail diversity!

Racial Hate Feeds a Gang War’s Senseless Killing

"Our cultural and ethnic diversity are cornerstones of a strong L.A.," the mayor [Antonio R. Villaraigosa] said Friday, "and violent crime motivated by the victim's skin color will not be tolerated."

Earl Ofari Hutchinson, an African-American syndicated columnist who plays host to the Los Angeles Urban Policy Roundtable, a weekly gathering in the Leimert Park neighborhood of South Los Angeles, said blacks complained that illegal Latin American immigrants were stealing jobs. Latinos, particularly newcomers unaccustomed to living among large numbers of African-Americans, in turn accuse blacks of criminal activity and harassing them.

"I think L.A. is a microcosm of what could happen in big cities in the future," Mr. Hutchinson said. "When we have the kind of tension you see in L.A. in the schools, the workplace and now hate-crime violence, my great concern is this is a horrific view of what could happen in other cities."

I'm amused at the non-sequitur nature of Villaraigosa's comment, especially as it is juxtaposed with Mr. Hutchinsons warning to America's big cities.

I'll ask again: What is it about mass-immigration that is supposed to "enrich" us? It really is sad that my rather dim view of human nature is so constantly and explicitly confirmed.

Technorati tags:
illegal immigration, illegal alien, immigration reform, immigration, diversity,multiculturalism

And I thought 24 went nuclear...

Sometimes the little things just set me off. The following is a snippet of what was posted at lisaforpres blog:

...remember how we treated the masses from Europe. They were not sent backa cross the Atlantic Ocean. Does the Statue of Liberty and everything it stands for still have meaning for native born Americans?

I am not suggesting that this is not a problem that needs to be addressed. Only wanting to remind us all; our history has been less than the best. We should consider this when dealing with illegal immigration today.

Here's how I responded:

Prior to the agreements that led to the founding of the United States, there was no such thing as "immigration" nor was there ever an "immigrant." The term "immigrant" was coined by an early US Cartographer in about 1787 and became widely used by American citizens to define a distinction between those who came before this nation was founded and those who had not taken part in the struggle for independence. To be perfectly accurate rather than semantically expedient, those who were here before independence was won were "Colonists." They were citizens of Great Britain and this land was part of that nation.

Thus, this nation's first citizens were not "immigrants" or even "descendants of immigrants." They were "descendants of British colonists" or British colonists themselves. These colonists brought with them the artifacts and rituals of British culture that, thanks to the distance and isolation, gradually became distinct from mother England between 1608 and 1789. During the colonial period, the world was in a rapid state of change. Feudal and tribal means of bonding people into cultures were giving way to the concept of "nation" that in time would supercede tribe and clan for the higher source of allegiance. The native tribes that existed in the Americas were not static, nor were they somehow more "romantic" than any other cultural group on earth. They fought wars amongst each other. They killed, often indiscriminately, and enslaved their vanquished foes. They were just like the rest of the human race. Their dispossession here by colonists was not one bit different or more violent than their previous displacement of those who came before them on this land. The "native Americans" our colonists came upon were merely the most recent conquerors of it. In the end, it was Americans who founded a nation, built a modern infrastructure and became an ever more distinct and unique culture. To consider things that happened before the nation as somehow permanently pertinent to us after we became a nation is only slightly more ignorant than it is arrogant.

Cultures that underpin nations have an interest in maintaining traditions and folkways that have worked over time. It is this concept of carrying forth tradition that led to the first laws pertaining to US naturalization in 1790. Our government has, supposedly, been responsible for maintaining national sovereignty, including the enactment and enforcement of immigration law, ever since. Contrary to popular myth, having never had a foreign-born population that made up as much as 15% of its residents, this nation has not ever been "a nation of immigrants."

A nation has a right and its government an obligation to define itself in many ways. Among the things most vital to our Republic is the fact that citizens -not aliens - have the right to decide who gets to come here, who gets to stay here, who is compatible, who is deemed assimilable and who is not. It is government's responsibility as a steward of the consent given to it by the governed to enact laws that fall in line with things to which citizens consent. More importantly, it is government's job to enforce the laws once they are on the books. In the case of immigration, the enforcement side of the equation has been a task left undone since about 1970. Thanks to this dereliction of duty by our "leaders," we today have a large segment of the general public grown ignorant to this nation's history, the importance of its cultural traditions, with many having bought into the notion that America has always been "multicultural" when it most certainly has not.

The fact of the matter is this: We are in the midst of an unprecedented increase in our nation's foreign-born population both as a percentage of the population and the percentage that arrives from a single source. Mexicans and other Latin Americans are not the product of comparatively similar folkways as past waves of immigrant groups have been. Prior to 1970, all of our significant increases in population from immigration were sourced from the nations of Europe; historically, immigrants to America were those with whom the source nation of our culture, Great Britain, had been "rubbing elbows" with for a couple thousand years. There is no reasonable similarity between the indigenous people or mestizos from Mexico and any prior migrant group that we have managed to assimilate.

Therefore we just don't know what might happen over the long term if we keep the faucet on full-blast. The early signs, such as educational attainment, escape from poverty and avoidance of prison, are not encouraging.

So, for those who insist that America can easily assimilate 20 million Latin Americans and their extended families (perhaps 80 million more), I have a few questions: How do you know this? How can you be sure? What does it mean for my children if you are wrong? What sort of America will you create when you force my children to share the franchise with their children? Is gambling with the cultural cohesiveness of this nation a prudent risk?

If there are no rational and reasonable forthcoming answers to these questions that indicate clearly that the path we find ourselves on will not leave for our descendants diminished standards of living and increased inter-cultural strife, then we must not continue the way we are headed.

Obviously there can be no such assurances!

The current mass-immigrationist regime is taking us down a very dark and foreboding alley from which I fear we will not survive this onslaught being brought to us by those with covert agendas. Some whisper in Republican ears that they need cheap labor as they fiddle in record profits while failing to invest and develop new means of production and labor-saving devices. Others whisper in Democrat ears that these people will be more compliant, more government-dependent. They are happy that the replacements might also be less likely to discern the key differences between a checked-and-balanced Republic and the chaos of direct Democracy: "Oh yes! Let's import new constituencies as replacements for these nagging freedom-lovers!"

No, Lisa. We should not "consider" that our history has been less than the "best" in regard to our handling of immigration, unless you are writing about the recent history of government neglect that has gotten us in this mess. This is not a time for reminiscing about false memes and errant indoctrination about who we are and what got us here.

Instead, it is high time that American citizens step up to beat the snot out of the whispering classes (figuratively or literally -whichever works best and fastest), take back our nation and restore the primacy of the rule of law.

Like Jack Bauer last night, I bet Lisa never saw this coming.

Technorati tags: hispanic vote,illegal immigration, illegal alien, immigration reform, immigration, multiculturalism

My heart refuses to bleed for criminals

It appears that Swift & Co's actions before the recent raids actually allowed the escape of 400 or so of those who had not only entered our nation illegally, but also had stolen and were using the identities of American citizens. Swift did everything it could to stop the raids from happening, even though it had months to clean up its act.

According to Swift: "These actions by ICE, or a comparable mass removal action,would have a direct impact on many legal workers, as well as suspected illegal workers, and would irreparably harm Swift by interfering with its legal business operations and by damaging its reputation."

I'm not moved at all by Swift's pleas.

The Department of Justice countered: "Put simply, there is no constitutional or statutory right for anyone to continue violating the law, and the government need not work on a potential law violators' timetable, especially where, as here, doing so would undermine legitimate law-enforcement operations."

I agree with the Department of Justice, but remain unconvinced that this action is anything but a smarmy feigning of interest in enforcement to give Congresscritters cover prior to their passing a massive amnesty that promises...PROMISES...to do irrevocable harm in its alteration of the character of this nation. The irony here is that if there is an amnesty now, considering the number of illegal aliens is at least double the number claimed by government, America's majority will finally learn out how onerously it has been duped. I foresee then end of the two-party system. Those who dream and idealize diversity and multiculturalism will probably get it.

And they're in for the shock of their lives when they find out they've led us all down the primrose path to a fractured, balkanized nation. Don't believe me? Then consider the following video, if you can stomach the Tribune's obviously wretched bias and appeal to emotion. Please pay attention early on to what some of the Mexicans who weren't arrested say in regard to this nation's sovereignty:

This sort of raid needs to happen somewhere in America every day for the next 10 years. Pick up a few hundred here, a couple dozen there, the occasional large cache of the worst of the worst and start perp-walking some of these corporate heads for good measure...problem solved. And maybe, just maybe, we'll piss off enough of those on the loony left who actually want these people to be amnestied that some of them will leave too.

Now THAT would be cause for celebration.

Technorati tags: Swift Meatpacking, illegal immigration, illegal alien, amnesty, employer sanctions, immigration reform,immigration, Congresscritters, sovereignty, We Need a Wall

PS: Let's all note that representatives of the Catholic Church again show up to stand in the corner of those who deny our status as a sovereign nation. Not that there's anything for them to gain by erasing our borders. No. Nothing to see here. Move along. Ignore the man in the collar with the rosary and an agenda.

Sheesh.

Droppin' Anchor Babies in New Orleans

Babies of the reconstruction Chicago Tribune

NEW ORLEANS -- First came the storm. Then came the workers. Now comes the baby boom.

And next comes the time for American taxpayers to divvy up.

In the latest twist to the demographic transformation of New Orleans since it was swamped by Hurricane Katrina last year, hundreds of babies are being born to Latino immigrant workers, both legal and illegal, who flocked to the city to toil on its reconstruction.

Oh joy! Now not only do we have billions of money already wasted in the reconstruction, we're going to have a whole new perpetual underclass. Whee!

Last summer, researchers at Tulane University estimated that there were 5,000 to 7,000 illegal Latino workers in Orleans Parish alone, excluding non-working relatives. But some community workers estimate that tens of thousands have arrived since the storm.

Five...ten...twentyfive...do I hear 100 thousand? Estimates can be so hard to pin down, and it seems especially so when it comes to illegal aliens.

Lacking health insurance and barred from most government assistance, expectant immigrant mothers can go to only the handful of charitable clinics that are still operating and that do not question a woman's immigration status.

This should be a reminder to them that they aren't supposed to be here and are ripping us off by staying.

The two health units providing prenatal care run by the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals saw more than 1,200 pregnant women from January to mid-November. Virtually all were Latino immigrants.

According to the CIA Fact Book, the birth rate per 1000 population is currently 14.14 per year. Let's consider that this Latino population is 2.5 times the norm and peg it at 36 births per thousand. That more than 1200 pregnant Latino women at the two clinics over 11 months annualizes to 1300. Now, how many Latinos, using our reasonable assumptions, does it take to create 1300 babies in a year?

Drumroll please....

36,111

Isn't that special! And that's just the number representative from from two clinics. The real numbers are probably far, far greater. This is the real story, not any of that other misplaced sniveling compassionate drivel the MSM will use to frame this issue.

Most of the immigrants are not new to the United States. They come from Texas, Florida or California, seeking construction work that can pay $150 a day. But there are some newcomers, including Sara Alvarado, a 26-year-old Honduran, who arrived in the United States in August after a monthlong odyssey through Mexico with her partner, Tony, 32.

Isn't it interesting how the reporter manages to skirt reporting the likelihood that most of Nawlin's new residents are illegal aliens by stating that they came from some of the other states. Folks, you have to start reading this crap with a far more critical eye or they'll slip important factoids right by you.

When Alvarado finally got to New Orleans, brought into the country by coyotes, or smugglers, who charged $6,000, she was more than six months pregnant. The last time she had seen a doctor was four months before.

So. They owe coyote's money. Great. Now we'll have to fork over more tax dollars when the Coyotes kidnap the baby.

Now she is the mother of Jackson Antonio, a U.S. citizen who came into the world at Tulane-Lakeside Hospital 12 days early on Oct. 17, the day the 300 millionth American was born.Dr. Kevin Work, an obstetrician who started a private practice a year before the hurricane, has been offering a low-cost prenatal care package, charging about $800 for the full term of a pregnancy, a small fraction of the typical bill.

He said he delivers 50 to 70 babies a month, most born to Latino immigrants. He delivered Jackson Antonio, though he could not remember doing so, the memory lost in a blur of births.

I applaud the doctor for his charity, but in a sane nation, I'd also expect that ICE would be picking these women up at about 7.5 months and getting them out of country before they drop more anchor babies. Mexico can thank us for the excellent prenatal care.

Alvarado's baby was required to stay 48 hours in the hospital. But Alvarado had to leave after 24. Emergency Medicaid pays for up to a 24-hour hospital stay for a vaginal delivery and a 48-hour stay for a Caesarean section.

Does anybody hear the sound of cash registers?

She spent the next day looking for a car safety seat, which hospitals require to discharge new babies. Health workers at Catholic Charities eventually found a car seat for her, as well as a crib.

She started Jackson Antonio straight off on baby formula because she expected to go to work as soon as she recovered from the delivery. But she cannot leave home, because there is nobody to care for the baby.

And the sound keeps getting louder!

Her partner, Tony, who declined to provide his last name, spends most days waiting with the day laborers at a Shell gas station near their home. But demand for workers has slackened.

And louder! I see the need for more prison beds. Growing numbers of unemployed, uneducated men loitering where beer is sold cannot end up well. It just can't.

Meanwhile, bills are piling up, starting with repayment of the $6,000 they borrowed to pay the coyotes' fee. They have repaid only about $1,300, Alvarado said. And they need $350 a month just for their share of rent and utilities.

WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE STOP THE SOUND OF THAT CASH REGISTER IN MY HEAD???!!!

Alvarado must also send money to Honduras for her two daughters, ages 7 and 9, who live with her mother. Tony has three daughters in Honduras, too, living with their mother.

AIEEEEEEEEE! STOP! PLEASE...MAKE...IT...STOP!!!

She said she might return to Honduras because there was no point to staying if she could not work. "I came to make a future for my mother and my girls," she said.

Oh, thank God. I feel better.

But if she can work, she will probably stay.

...*sigh*

MEDIC!!!

And the baby boom may even provide an opportunity. She said she might go into business taking care of the babies of other Latino mothers."

I'm going to cry now. Good night.

Technorati tags: illegal immigration, illegal alien, immigration reform, immigration, anchor babies,

If it walks like a duck...

A brief history:

• November 19 - Congressman Tom Tancredo says in an interview with WorldNet Daily, "Look at what has happened to Miami. It has become a Third World country."
• November 27 - Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen objected and extended an invitation to Congressman Tancredo to visit Miami saying, "come on down, Tom, the water's fine."
• November 29 - Florida Governor Jeb Bush replies, "Miami is a wonderful city filled with diversity and heritage that we choose to celebrate, not insult.''
• November 29 - Tancredo replies, "I certainly understand and appreciate your need and desire to try and create the illusion of Miami as a multiethnic 'All American' city. Indeed sir, one of us is naive."
• December 12 - It is announced that Tancredo, taking up Bush and Ros-Lehtinen on their offer, will speak at the December 14 Rotary Club of Miami meeting about "Renewing America: The Need for Assimilation."
• December 13 - The Rusty Pelician Restaurant cancels the Rotary meetings apparently after bomb and death threats were called into the Miami Herald and after the restaurant's staff balked at working at an event where Tancredo would be speaking.
• December 13 - Scientists reiterate that animals that look like ducks, walk like ducks, crap like ducks and have duck DNA are, in fact, ducks.
• December 13 - Tancredo spokesman Carlos Espinosa backs up the scientists with our December 14 quote of the day:

DenverPost.com - Tancredo's Miami speech canceled

"What says Third World Country more than a bomb threat at a speech by a politician?"

It cannot be said any better, folks!

Technorati tags: immigration reform, immigration, sovereignty, political correctness,cleft society, diversity, multiculturalism

Religion of "piece?"

Ahhhh! The glory of multiculturalism's poison masked by the stench of political correctness to go lightly with one's morning coffee.

Raped in Oslo - The Brussels Journal

"Two out of three charged with rape in Norway’s capital are immigrants with a non-western background according to a police study. The number of rape cases is also rising steadily. Unni Wikan, a professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo, in 2001 said that 'Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes' because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The professor’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: 'Norwegian women must realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.'"

So Olso's per capita rape rate is now six times that of New York City and an academic (of course it had to be an academic) steps up to tell us that it is the west who must adapt to the more vile aspects of an imported culture born of Islam. I think they call that Dhimmitude, don't they?. I'm surprised he just didn't come out and say "If rape is inevitable, enjoy it."

I have to note that the press in Norway appears just as indoctrinated as most of America's MSM against providing news consumers with the proper facts to make any sort of value judgments, except for those that would be positive, when it comes to reporting on the activities of immigrant populations. In my previous post about the former-illegal-alien-cum-prospective-citizen who dragged a three-year-old boy to his death beneath her car last week, I note that after reading the story again, I'm struck by the reporter's seemingly intentional glossing-over the likelihood that the woman perpetrator was at one time an illegal alien; if the accused had been a non-minority native-born American, you can bet your sweet bippy that there would have been extensive background information in the story, and the reporter would probably have found somebody to quote out of context to make the alleged criminal out to be a bad person. Instead, the reporter goes about as far as she can to surround the accused with warm fuzzies.

Not only is there a subtle, endemic MSM bias against the native-born majorities of the West, there is also a not-so-subtle mandate for framing alien interlopers in the most positive terms allowed by every situation.

Technorati tags: crime, political correctness, death of the west, diversity, multiculturalism, dhimmitude

"The boy was dragged 0.85 miles..."

Arrrgghhh! I just want to spit:

Driver voices regret for fatal accident - baltimoresun.com

"The pickup truck driven by Arellano de Hogue struck 55-year-old Marjorie Thomas as she pushed her grandson, Elijah Cozart, in a stroller across Goucher Boulevard, just south of Colbury Road, near the boy's home, police said.

With the stroller caught in the undercarriage of the truck, the boy was dragged 0.85 miles before the driver briefly swerved into a yard on Regester Avenue and the child's body was dislodged, according to charging documents.

A police officer who followed drag and scuff marks from the scene of the crash to an address in the 1500 block of Regester Avenue found the child, gasping for air, near deep ruts in the grassy yard, according to charging documents. The boy's lower body had been mangled and his clothes were almost gone, police wrote in the court documents.

The blue stroller, located nearby in the driveway, was "twisted, in pieces and completely destroyed," according to the charging documents. Elijah was pronounced dead about 4:15 p.m. Friday at Good Samaritan Hospital."

Earlier in the story, the woman, a soon-to-be naturalized American citizen who came here from Mexico, said through an interpreter that she felt "really bad."

Court documents made public yesterday contained new details of the incident, including that the boy appeared to be conscious when police found him more than eight-tenths of a mile from where he was struck.

They also show that Arellano de Hogue told police that her brakes did not work because the stroller was stuck beneath the vehicle - and that when she was able to stop, she pulled the empty stroller from beneath the vehicle and drove home.

She told police that she did not call 911 about the incident "because of her 'nervous state' and it gave her amnesia," according to a statement of probable cause prepared for the court by police.

No. You feel "really bad" when you knock over somebody's mailbox. It appears from the story that Arrellano de Hogue was an illegal alien given a get into America free card by one of the previous amnesties our government has given millions interlopers who had no respect for our laws to begin with, so why would we expect her to stop after she ran over an elderly woman and crushed a child in a stroller?

More:

Another woman at her home, who was a passenger in the truck, told police that she and Arellano de Hogue were returning from a Wal-Mart at the time of the incident. That woman, who according to the court document gave differing accounts of what happened after the accident, was not charged.

Did her passenger have "amnesia" too?

Then there's this:

Arellano de Hogue is a permanent resident of the United States and has taken - but not yet received the results of - a citizenship test, her lawyer, Michael A. Zwaig, said in court.

If this woman has taken her citzenship test, then why in the hell does she still need a freaking interpreter? Sigh. And the dimwits at DHS will still probably make her a citizen. Just watch.

Technorati tags: amnesty, illegal immigration,illegal alien, immigration reform, immigration, crime

"Go Back To Europe, White Man"

A big HT to FreedomFolks

Please watch:

Here's the deal: There are a lot more like him in our midst, folks. And El Presidente Jefe Bush and his merry band of corporatist and leftists, accidentally allied in their support for mass immigration, have no concern for what their open borders plans will do (and even less concern for what they might do) to the prospects of this nation remaining in the first world for future generations of Americans. They would have the majority replaced by more compliant, government-dependent serfs who historically have shown no commitment to individual liberty. Those of us who understand our rights and obligations as citizens are deemed too difficult to deal with by those holding keys to this evil alliance, so replacing us with serfs would be logically preferable.

If you want to know what things would look like if the south had won the civil war, you can see a fairly reasonable facsimilie if you look to the shadow leadership that is managed by influence peddlers on the far left and "free trade trumps all" disciples of economism on the right. The only substantial difference between the importation of slaves and the importation of illegal alien...or amnestied...or guest worker...serfs is that eventually the latter three will gain the franchise in far greater numbers. As their vote begins to form a substantial plurality, they will transmogrify and warp the direction of government. They will give their new overlords more power in exchange for unfettered access to the big nanny state feeding teat, and eventually they will overwhelm our heritage.

I'm committed to stopping the realization of reconquista visions of some horrific post-American America as espoused so succinctly by the bastard in this video. I can only hope, and pray, that there are still enough real Americans left; that is, those who know, have learned, still remember and still believe that our founders intended for this nation to be conservative in its approach to change. The wholesale radicalization of our underpinnings via the continuation of this 40- year mass immigration debacle cannot continue. Those who have come illegally should be compelled via strict enforcement to leave, and those who refuse to go of their own accord should be dealt with most harshly: There should be gigantic catapults stationed at the border and used to send people like the guy in the video back to Mexico.

Technorati tags: hispanic vote,illegal immigration,illegal alien,amnesty, reconquista, economism, immigration reform, immigration

(I'm only kidding about the catapults...or am I?)

Human Resources Pros Must Be Getting Anxious

Today I'm linking to an old story that's been given new life. Aside from ICE actually being allowed to do its job, the story below is also noteworthy because the story appears at Business and Legal Reports in the Human Resources section. I've long noted here that, thanks to infiltration of its professional organizations' leadership by secularists and multiculturalists, the profession of human resources has become one most loathesome I can imagine, falling somewhere beneath used car salesman and Mel Martinez staffer while remaining only slightly above NAMBLA member on my list of the most heinous group identifiers.

It is, perhaps, even more telling that the BLR now devotes a whole section to illegal immigration. If human resource types are gathering information on immigration enforcement activities, it might just be likely that they are planning for imminent changes in the way they do their jobs. The tipping point in HR might just be met by a minor increase in enforcement at this point; they don't neccesarily have to see their colleagues perp-walked to imagine themselves in such straits.

Business Owner to Forfeit $1.5M in Illegal Alien Case

"The owner of an Indiana company that performed stucco-related services at construction sites in seven Midwest states has agreed to forfeit more than $1.5 million after pleading guilty to conspiring to harbor illegal aliens.

Robert Adrian Porcisanu, a 28-year-old citizen of Romania who is also known as Iulian Jijie, and his Franklin , Indiana , business Stucco Design Inc., agreed to forfeit $1,581,000. Porcisanu was also sentenced to 18 months in prison.

According to court documents, Porcisanu and Stucco Design Inc. were able to undercut competitors' bids and win contracts to perform stucco-related construction work with general contractors by taking advantage of cheaper labor costs by using illegal alien employees."

Also of note here is that there is no mention that these criminals are supposed to be deported once they have served their sentences.

Technorati tags: illegal immigration, illegal alien, employer sanctions, immigration reform, immigration, Mel Martinez, multiculturalism