A lefty becomes victim of SMACKDOWN!!

This article steamed me the other day. Not to be outdone by the 900 responses, mostly against, his first drivel attracted, he decided to wade into the part of the pool he peed in again.

A soldier responds:

Old War Dogs: WaPo Weasels II

"Want to slam our soldiers, Arkin?
Well here is one to slam.
I got used to Lefty slamming
When I came back from Vietnam.
So you want to put a muzzle
On our brave fighting men?
Well try muzzling me you jerk,
Just tell me where and when."

Go read the rest. Brilliant!

HT: Michelle Malkin

Technorati tags: moonbats

One of These Things is Not Like The Others

One of these things just doesn't belong. Can you tell which thing is not like the others?

Class Assignment

1) Click on the first link.

2) Then read the story that brings us the moronic quote of the day:

Secrets of Obama family unlocked - World - Times Online

" 'I believe the American electorate is ready to support leaders who embody the American dream despite their differences. In doing so, we affirm ourselves as a tolerant people,' said William Galston, a senior fellow in public policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington."

3) Then click on the second link.

4) Select and read the biographical information about any 5 random presidents and make note of their heritage (that's a reference to his parents and ancestry, for those of you who are Democrats).

5) In 150 words or less, tell me how this guy ever gets elected President of the United States of America; if you use the term "racist," or "Nazi," you get an automatic "F" and are banished to the Godwin's Law closet forever.

If the origins of a candidate for President of the United States are somehow off-limits for discussion, then the nation is already too far gone. It cannot be saved from falling victim to whatever ideaology opposes it because it will no longer have any ideaology or moral absolutes of its own. While I believe we've been led down a radical and dangerous path by political correctness, multiculturalism, forced diversity and redefined "tolerance" for 40 years or so, I don't believe we've fallen to the point at which we'd elect someone president who represents the eradication of our traditions and our culture. The Hate America^TM crowd loves Obama primarily because he represents the antithesis of Americanism.

I hope the Dhimmicrats do nominate him. It will ensure a GOP victory in 2008, and likely a sweep of both Houses of Congress by true Conservatives. It will be the biggest-ever GOTV boost for those who oppose the dogma and semantics of cultural Marxism.


Technorati tags: Barack Obama

Fourth Circuit affirms Christian Clubs' free speech rights

I've spent a bit of time reading the thoughts of some atheist leftists in the blogosphere in an attempt to gain some perspective on why they seem to hate Christians so much. It occurs to me that there probably is no such thing as a "conservative athiest" because conservatism requires thought based on the premise that there are moral absolutes to which a culture and a nation must defer, in all instances.

I'll bullet point out my observations after bringing you some yuletide cheer:

Liberty Counsel: Doors Now Wide Open for Christian Clubs at Nation's Schools

"I think it's ironic as these schools hassle the Good News Clubs, because they're great organizations," Staver shares. "They teach character, they teach morality, they teach right and wrong, they teach respect, and they do it all from a Christian viewpoint -- and the kids' lives are literally changed."

• Athiests are afraid. Only fear can raise such bile and vitriol in opposition to the very things that are the undisputable starting point for the culture and the freedoms they have.
  
• Athiests must not be very deep thinkers, despite whatever conflated inflation of their own selves they might believe. Seriously. Try as I might, I cannot find an instance of an athiest even pondering an explanation for "first cause." Do they ever go down this path, or do they consider the starting point for the universe to be truly uninteresting and so devoid of merit that they won't discuss it?
  
• Athiests approach arguments with a markedly adolescent point of view. Whenver I read their rants against religion I always get the feeling that some part of them is stuck in their teen years. The tone of their mocking is a spot-on rendition of the all-knowing everyteen lament that parents are backward and don't know anything that might be of value to them for the future.
  
• Athiests are among the most intolerant of all people. They've made up their minds that anyone who believes in God isn't worthy of respect. I'll grant that some of them don't wear their scorn on their sleeves so clearly, but I'm convinced that those who athiests who don't immediately start mocking theists for their faith immediately brand the faithful as idiots as soon as a person's faith persuasion is determined. Maybe they don't say so, but they think less of us.
  
• Theists, at least those who come from Christian upbringings, generally don't have such automatic feelings when they learn of someone's athiesm. And I think that's because there is nary a Christian who hasn't suffered a crisis of faith and recovered; the default thinking mode that a Christian assumes when confronted by the athiest is "well, there is hope that this one might come around."

That said, hooray for the Fourth Circuit. I know I'll probably never be able to say that for the Ninth!

Technorati tags: conservatism,theism,liberalism,leftism,atheism,