Saturday, March 31, 2007

A Troll Gets His Due

I've been following, and participating, in a tit-for-tat with a troll who has taken up residence at FreedomFolks using the nom-de-keyboard "hannitized." He's not really worthy of the level of respect I usually demand to bring up such lunacy; he ran away from this blog's comment section after I made it clear that he would not be allowed to post non-sequitur and/or nonsensical Leftist links to make his feeble points. I'll not be a party to driving traffic, and its related profit, to the DailyKos or Indymedia crowd. The only reason I bring him up now is that this troll's comments serve as the archetype evil for anyone who is trying to make a point about the vital dangers of multiculturalism, the cultural emptiness of diversity, and the inescapable primacy of tribal instinct - hard-coded into human nature - that makes promoting a too-heterogeneous society so horrifically wrong.

A couple of weeks ago, I decided that it was beneath my standards to address this quasi-sentient infestation directly at my friends' blog, so I began to comment on his comments in the third person. I also assumed a mocking tone and made every effort to find a more appropriate moniker for him. Eventually, I settled on "hispandertized" because it best described his position on most things: He's got a monumental inferiority complex that exhibits itself in puffed-up "my people are superior to your people, but your people STOLE OUR LANDS and made us less great than we ought to be" attitude. Every time another "American-by-technicality" is born into a family like that which begat this hispantertized pathogen, there is made another weak link in the chain that binds Americans together.

We are made less when such trolls have sex, except with themselves.

What's most laughable, and sad, about Jake's week-kneed little parasite is that he really doesn't know to what tribe he belongs. Sometimes he's a Spaniard, sometimes he's an indigenous Mexica, sometimes he's a Native American. But never, no never, is he an American - even though ours is the nation to which he was born, and he probably would swear to which he remains allegiant. But his rantings betray him. He hates America. He hates it's origins. He hates anything that might be a byproduct of Western Civilization's success especially if its origin is even tangentially Anglo Saxon.

But he loves all things Mexican.

Mexico's indigenous tribes can do no wrong in his book. America would be best served if that third-world nation's people could freely retake the lands America won, then purchased 150 years ago. To him, the "indigenous peoples" still own it depite the fact that the mythical lands of Atzlan were Mexican territory for barely a quarter-century before America fought and won them in a war. Most of us know that reconquista is not a salient point of view for a true American; however, it is an unwavering belief for most Mexicans.

Hispandertized is walking, talking proof that some tribes just will never assimilate fully to the American way. The longer we allow the alien invasion, particularly from our south, to proceed at such breakneck pace, the harder it will be for this nation to remain unified throughout its next generations. I have to thank this troll for being exemplar of how foolishly wrong the notion that "all peoples are compatible with American ideals" really is.

Seeing that hispandertized lives to browbeat us with the wonders and moral superiority of the indegnous people's of Mexico, I thought I'd close with an brilliant example of those "wonders."

Enjoy:

Mordida, Bribes - Some Things in Mexico Seem To Never Change

In Chiapas, the Chamula Indians obligate their tribesmen to be members of the ruling PRI party. Anyone in the tribe who prefers membership in a different party or even criticizes the PRI is ostracized and driven from their tribal lands. The PRI maintains this loyalty by providing the Chamulas with the Coca Cola franchise for the region. Big time mordida.



When creatures like hispandertized call me a "racist," it's confirmation that I'm correct in my analysis of the alien invasion. How ironic is it that he cannot acknowledge the tribal preference for one's own kind that motivates him! Only someone filled with equal parts hate for his nation and self-loathing would invade someone else's Internet domain, build a soapbox there and do nothing but berate the virtual townsfolk who happen by.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Core Lessons: Dismissing The Liberal Naysayers

I wrote this as the introduction to the Politics Section of my original American Kernel site. As I recall, this took less than 15 minutes to write. As was my practice in the days before blogging made immediacy more important, I put this aside for a couple of days, made only a couple grammar tweaks and posted it.

"America's viability will forever depend upon its institutions, laws and leaders remaining mindful of the historical values and morality to which our forefathers were dedicated. While crafting the Constitution, then campaigning for its ratification, the framers knew that 'The People' would never adopt a system of government that lacked an irrevocable attachment to the Christian mores and ideals prevalent in and shared between the various contemporary denominations that dominated colonial and revolutionary era cultural discourse.

'During the 150 years preceding the revolution, the foundation for America's future success was forged by determined people who shared a very narrowly diverse set of morals, values and beliefs. This common consciousness paved the way for us to join together and create a whole new way of thinking about liberty that had not existed before on this earth. Had Madison, Hamilton and Jay written the Federalist Papers in denial that our freedom was won by Providence, or had our other founders neglected to humbly assume an appropriate Christian comportment in asking the several states to join as United States, this nation would not exist.

But modern liberals don't want you to know about any of this, and they don't want your children to be exposed to concepts or monuments that represent the facts. That's why the ACLU descends like locusts upon any public symbol that might remind Americans about the ideals that fertilized the fruits of our ancestor's labor.


'The secular left rabidly hates the fact that biblical ideals are so tightly woven into the intent of our Constitution, our culture, our values and everything that is or has ever been "good" in this land. Ongoing efforts by liberal, subversive, America-hating groups and misguided, activist jurists attempt to undermine the foundations of what we stand for as a nation and a people. The judicial bastardization of the establishment clause of the First Amendment is prima facie evidence of their intentions.

'Today, our Supreme Court spews forth one onerous ruling after another that infringes upon areas that are legally the purview of Congress and the states. They have even begun to cite the opinions of foreign courts as rationale for rulings that restrict the rights of Americans. Such decisions are a grave insult to the intentions, efforts and legacy of our founders.

"It is clear that the scheming naysayers on the left have had their way for far too long by misrepresenting the moral and cultural circumstances present at the time in which this nation was born. The left's modus operandi relies upon being able to divert the focus of debate toward bits of out-of-context minutiae, such as their stubbornly repeating a mantra that consists of one line from a politically motivated letter that Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptists. Liberal thought offers nothing to America that doesn't require our abandoning the things that made us a great nation.

"It is pleasing to see that most true conservatives no longer suffer lightly the lunacy espoused by liberal leaders and their dupes. Christian precepts are integral to the events that led to this nation's birth and they sustain us still. Every day, more true patriots are finding the resolve to restore truth to social discourse by vocally exposing political correctness for the socially corrupt lie that it is. To me, there is nothing more absurd than liberals who prattle on about "tolerance" as they plot the next step in their campaign to banish the Ten Commandments and other important symbols of our particular brand of freedom from public institutions."

Technorati tags: , ,

Labels: , , ,

|

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Attrition Strategy: Phased Redeployment

Jeff Jacoby, ersatz "Conservative" for the Boston Globe, writes another wee bit of tripe today about illegal aliens. He relies on the old canard "we can't deport them all! there are too many!" Which is really getting tiresome to read considering there are 237 THOUSAND references to the attrition strategy on Google.

I don't know if Jeffy took a shrill pill before writing this drivel, but I'd like to set him straight.

What if we deport them all? - The Boston Globe

"Some 1.2 million illegals are believed to work in construction," Holman Jenkins wrote in the Wall Street Journal last June. "If the cost of home building goes up, demand goes down: Less wood is sold, fewer nails, fewer power tools, fewer pickup trucks. Contractors would make less profit; ergo, Harley-Davidson would sell fewer Road Kings with all the chrome and finery."

Lord know's we've tried to explain the idea of getting most illegal aliens to leave by choice via enforcement-compelled attrition: Start enforcing the law and the jobs will disappear; if the jobs disappear, millions will leave as they did in the 1950s when Eisenhower succeeded in ending the problem of illegal immigration then. Perhaps because the word "attrition" is often used as a military term that connotes we're winning, the Leftists just can't get it and the Neo-Conservatives have no stomach for it because it suggests we aren't winning fast enough.

Let me try to put this in the language that both a Leftist (or one posing as a conservative like Jacoby) and a Neo-Conservative will understand. We need to implement a strategy of "phased redeployment" of our valiant illegal immigrant criminals. Over a five-year period, I propose we shift the majority to Mexico, some to other South and Central American Nations, some to Ireland and still other smaller groups to various nations around the globe. Their redeployment destinations will be dependent on their knowledge of the language and customs of the nation to which they go. For the Leftist, this is a benefit because it creates a wedge within the populations of poorer nations who can later be recruited to assist Leftist American youth who arrive to do their Peace Corp stints. For the Neo-Conservative, it creates a core bloc of potential insurgents who can be recruited by the CIA when the next Wilsonian President with "we can democratize the world" delusions is elected.

On the home front, the five-year-plan goes as follows: A blue ribbon panel investigates which types of businesses are employing illegal aliens, which should take all of about 15 minutes using the data already collected both by government agencies and by private foundations. From this list, they create a schedule working backwards from the five-year deadline that allocates Border Patrol and ICE business enforcement resources in an ever-increasing web of pressure on companies that are skirting our laws. The final list will start with the business types with the fewest illegal aliens in their work forces and provides for enforcement resources to be ratcheted up over four and a half years, finally getting to the business types with the most illegal aliens in their work forces in year five.

Why four and a half years of enforcement activity, not five? Simple. The first six months is the publicity phase; we advertise and promote the schedule the panel creates so that the businesses are all given fair warning and roughly know when their "deadline" is for getting illegal aliens off of their under-the-table payrolls. This should make the transition as orderly as possible. These businesses relied on American labor at some time in the recent past, and they will have to get used to a less slave-like work force again. And their prevailing wages will have to go up.

I know it will be tough for construction companies to again see themselves as pathways to the middle class for young and less skilled Americans, but I know that we can do this. It will take some time for our hospitals to get used to not having an overflow of non-paying patients in their emergency rooms, but I have faith they'll get through it. I don't know what they'll do in California when they stop having to build one new school a day and gang members are as easy to spot as a red wine spill on a white carpet, but the Americans there have always been a hearty lot. Maybe they'll have to call Dr. Phil to console all of those state legislators who lost their power bases and probably won't be re-elected. But I never said this would be painless.

Setting things right after letting them be wrong for so long is never painless.

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Oh dem RACIST Cherokees

This news item should have some PC heads exploding today. Imagine, a people determining by vote as to whom qualifies for being part of their nation! It's almost as if they would wish to have immigration and citizenship laws or something - and that they be enforced! OMG!


Cherokees vote out slaves' descendants - Yahoo! News

"'The Cherokee people exercised the most basic democratic right, the right to vote,' tribal Principal Chief Chad Smith said. 'Their voice is clear as to who should be citizens of the Cherokee Nation. No one else has the right to make that determination.'"
Seriously, the Cherokees are right. But I'll bet that nobody, even the most mentally-challenged Leftist, has the gall to wage a war of political correctness upon them.

If only so many American citizens were not so wussified...


Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Orwell Lives In UK!

I'll presume he's not eating at McDonalds so as not to upset Prince Charles and his showhound, Camilla.

Saying 'bloody foreigner' is ruled racist Uk News News Telegraph
Law Lords have ruled that calling someone a "bloody foreigner" and saying "get back to your own country" can amount to racial abuse.
This is from the land of "thought crime." The politically correct religiously secular left must clip headlines like this for their collages. Surely it's a papier mache and Elmer's glue night somewhere because of this!

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Saturday, February 03, 2007

A lefty becomes victim of SMACKDOWN!!

This article steamed me the other day. Not to be outdone by the 900 responses, mostly against, his first drivel attracted, he decided to wade into the part of the pool he peed in again.

A soldier responds:


Old War Dogs: WaPo Weasels II

"Want to slam our soldiers, Arkin?
Well here is one to slam.
I got used to Lefty slamming
When I came back from Vietnam.
So you want to put a muzzle
On our brave fighting men?
Well try muzzling me you jerk,
Just tell me where and when."
Go read the rest. Brilliant!

HT: Michelle Malkin

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Friday, December 22, 2006

Fourth Circuit affirms Christian Clubs' free speech rights

I've spent a bit of time reading the thoughts of some atheist leftists in the blogosphere in an attempt to gain some perspective on why they seem to hate Christians so much. It occurs to me that there probably is no such thing as a "conservative athiest" because conservatism requires thought based on the premise that there are moral absolutes to which a culture and a nation must defer, in all instances.

I'll bullet point out my observations after bringing you some yuletide cheer:

Liberty Counsel: Doors Now Wide Open for Christian Clubs at Nation's Schools


"I think it's ironic as these schools hassle the Good News Clubs, because they're great organizations," Staver shares. "They teach character, they teach morality, they teach right and wrong, they teach respect, and they do it all from a Christian viewpoint -- and the kids' lives are literally changed."
  • Athiests are afraid. Only fear can raise such bile and vitriol in opposition to the very things that are the undisputable starting point for the culture and the freedoms they have.
  • Athiests must not be very deep thinkers, despite whatever conflated inflation of their own selves they might believe. Seriously. Try as I might, I cannot find an instance of an athiest even pondering an explanation for "first cause." Do they ever go down this path, or do they consider the starting point for the universe to be truly uninteresting and so devoid of merit that they won't discuss it?
  • Athiests approach arguments with a markedly adolescent point of view. Whenver I read their rants against religion I always get the feeling that some part of them is stuck in their teen years. The tone of their mocking is a spot-on rendition of the all-knowing everyteen lament that parents are backward and don't know anything that might be of value to them for the future.
  • Athiests are among the most intolerant of all people. They've made up their minds that anyone who believes in God isn't worthy of respect. I'll grant that some of them don't wear their scorn on their sleeves so clearly, but I'm convinced that those who athiests who don't immediately start mocking theists for their faith immediately brand the faithful as idiots as soon as a person's faith persuasion is determined. Maybe they don't say so, but they think less of us.
  • Theists, at least those who come from Christian upbringings, generally don't have such automatic feelings when they learn of someone's athiesm. And I think that's because there is nary a Christian who hasn't suffered a crisis of faith and recovered; the default thinking mode that a Christian assumes when confronted by the athiest is "well, there is hope that this one might come around."

That said, hooray for the Fourth Circuit. I know I'll probably never be able to say that for the Ninth!

Technorati tags: ,,,,,

Labels: , , , , , ,

|