Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Happy Socialist, Anarchist, Illegal Alien Day

I'm not going to get a chance to post much on this new day of arrogance. I've let my U.S. Senator from Cuba know I loathe him. I've ranted to a few friends who still don't see the threat that the interlopers pose to their children, and I wrote one comment on a blog.

That's what I'm copying over here. First, I'll repost the original pabulum:

howl

Count my voice among those who are today marching and asking for a path to citizenship for immigrants in this country. Look, I know they broke the law by coming here (I won't even get into how suspect it is for countries to set their own laws on immigration and expect citizens of another country to just follow them), but what right do we have to demand that they not enter our borders? For all America is doing wrong, it is still the most free country in the world and the one most able to provide a good life for its inhabitants. How can we expect people to not come to this country if we can offer them such a better life than the one they have in other countries? How can we, and especially myself and other Christians, tell people to not come to us even though we can help them? Since when is the saying on the Statue of Liberty about "bring me your huddled masses..." a epithet without meaning?

Too often we americans forget that our history is, in certain areas, largely one of breaking laws and theft and questionable citizenship. We stole land from the indians and just arbitrarily said it was ours; it's not like we Americans were the first ones on the scene here. We fought wars to gain our own independence because we believed that America could hold a better life. We welcomed immigrants from Europe from the thousands, laying the groundwork for the America we have today with our rich differing cultures and dialects and traditions. We are not a nation of indigenous peoples. We are a nation built on a history of huddled masses, immigrants, poverty-stricken farmers, religious freedom-seekers, soldiers, land-grabbers, and dreamers.

How can we deny anyone else in this whole world the same thing? Happy May Day, everyone.




Katie's Dad said...

When Emma Lazarus rises from the dead and proves she was a founding father, not some PR-Stunt poetry contest winner, then I might have a thimble of compassion for an illegal alien. But probably not then, either. For she was nothing more than a foil for a newspaperman's quest for profit. No figure in American history is more over-promoted. It's just sick to base policy that determines who we are, and what sort of fate-in-nation awaits our ancestors, upon that blithering tripe of a poem. Really.

Being romantically distracted by baseless ideals while deadly serious issues like sovereignty and societal cohesiveness are at stake is the epitome of stupidity.

Instead, I'm informed by Thomas Jefferson who wrote:"In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass."

George Washington said, prescriptively: "Citizens, by birth or choice, of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles."

John Jay wrote, also prescriptively: "I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people -- a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.

"This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties."


As a Christian, you'd be better served by thinking about the plight of the people these interloping opportunists leave behind; the poverty they exacerbate back home; the broken families; the elderly with no youth to support them in a a community; the tacit support your compassion gives to despots who are relieved to see the departure of those who are most physically able to threaten their corrupt status quo; and, most importantly, the detrimental impact upon the futures of America's children that such an unprecedented influx surely portends. Do you ever think about that stuff? Or has the romanticism for the "needy other" completely made you blind to
the needs and best interests of your own?

Is it OK if one in five of our residents has no connection to, empathy for or sense of stewardship on behalf of those who fought and bled and died to start this grand experiment? Even if that assures that heritage is erased? And even if the loss of that heritage puts an end to the experiment?

If so, please send your kids to schools built in the shadow of your new Tower of Babel; but, please, make provisions for mine to go to schools in which english is the only language allowed to be spoken. While you're at it, give my little girl a place to grow up in which this nation's sense of Providence is allowed to thrive without being held hostage to the influence of those who would sell it all out on a whim.

I was tempted to beat the author up over his asinine "we stole the land from the indians" crap, but I figured he'd not be able to digest any additional de-programming thoughts in one post.


Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

The Ultimate Goal of Tolerance: Self Extinction?

From Lawrence Auster's View from the Right, a commenter posits this gem:

Is the Islamic takeover of Europe inevitable?

In the end, I think things are going to get much, much worse before they get better, precisely because liberals refuse to accept the most common sense limitations on the principle of tolerance. They risk discrediting tolerance altogether by making it synonymous with self-extinction. An outpouring of hatred and violence is almost certain to erupt at some stage, since nowhere do people gladly suffer replacement of their own people civilization by that of others. A tipping point must eventually be reached, and when it does, the reaction could be spasmodic and bloody. This can easily be avoided, but liberals are determined to see this suicidal path through to the bitter end, such is their devotion to a program which I think even they suspect is daily darkening the future of mankind.
I'd not considered the end game that comes part and parcel with today's politically-correct definition of the word tolerance. While I have to ponder it a bit, my initial thought is that this is probably true. While the post thread from which this comes is in regard to the Islamification of Europe, I think it equally applicable to the United States.


Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , ,

|

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Quote of the Day Double Header!

I'm a big fan of clarity, which is probably the element most lacking in this debate over mass and illegal immigration. If our ancestors could witness it, they'd think it was some bizarre case study in how not to govern the nation and the liberty for which they pined and bled and died.

Here are a couple of fantastic quotes from two equally important op-eds I found today:


RealClearPolitics - Articles - Bush's Immigration Defeatism

Bush’s failings at the border mirror his failings in Iraq. In both places, he underestimated the need for security and order and has undertaken a push for them only belatedly. In both places, he was motivated by a good-hearted belief in the essential fungibility of people. He thought that Iraqis naturally would have the same desires as Westerners; and on the border, he assumes that Mexicans are seamlessly interchangeable with Americans, since they seek employment here. In Iraq, he has tried to compensate for his mistakes. On the border, he seems hopeless.

Those who hold that there is any form of ethics, morality or human good in promoting "the fungibility of people" are probably the most evil people around these days. Lowering humanity to commodity status is a very subtle evil; there is little that would torture me more than having to associate with people who have no qualms that their path to enrichment subjugates the most vulnerable and helpless while displacing those just marginally less vulnerable and helpless.

And while I'm on the topic of subjugation...

An immigration bill for 'plantation owners' - Newsday.com

Now, we have neo-plantation owners, inheritors of the "Gone With the Wind" class, seeking to set national policy. Perhaps, in their greed and shortsightedness, those who depend on non-free labor - slaves back then, illegals and "guest workers" today - are so blindly eager for short-term profit they are willing to saddle the rest of the country with long-term problems of multiculturalism and balkanization, made all the worse by welfare-state dependency. Exploitative employers brought the whirlwind to this country once, and now they want to do it again.

Let me reiterate a portion of the immediately previous post:


How many American children must have their lives permanently altered for the worse before their plight starts to matter to those who misplace their compassion only with interlopers while ignoring the needs and futures of our native sons and daughters?
I rue the repurcussions of our having huge, slave-labor-class diasporas living adjacent to our neighborhoods when the next serious economic downturn happens or when the next inevitable well-coordinated attack comes courtesy "the religion of peace" and requires both our unified diligence and ability to communicate with each other clearly. We now have huge resident masses of other-tongued, foreign-allegiant peasants who think that and behave as if the United States exists solely for their convenience. Is it reasonable to think they will be easily pacified when their jobs, their access to the government teat and our tolerance for anyone lurking in the shadows disappears due to calamity?

I'm afraid it's going to get really, really ugly if we don't remove them fairly, incrementally, and soon.

Technorati tags:, ,

Labels: , , , ,

|

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Demographers Bassackward

This is laughable:

Census: Immigration helps big metros - 04/05/2007 - MiamiHerald.com

"Immigrants are filling the void as domestic migrants are seeking opportunities in other places," said Mark Mather, a demographer at the Population Reference Bureau, a private research organization.
Might it ever occur to demographers that a big reason for the "void" is the characteristic "otherness" of the very influx of immigrants they suggest that cities need? Here, and in most current dialog regarding immigrants and cities in America, demographic cause and effect are presented as ass-backwards as possible by "experts."

For a counter-example, here is my own experience: I truly loved my hometown while growing up and as a young adult in S. Florida as it morphed from a small city into part of a vital coastal megalopolis. But in recent years, thanks to bad immigration policy and lax enforcement of law, the character and culture of the growth factors took a turn for the worse. My family and I came to view the large foreign-born population infusion as not a healthy or neighborly benefit at all; rather, we learned it presented contrary belief system wedges that frequently made us uncomfortable in our own home. When culture, language and heritage are first challenged by others in a subtle manner and eventually overtly denigrated by ungrateful "wretched refuse," something has to give.

And in our case, it was us who gave in and fled. The rapid demographic shift fomented such a cultural arrogance on the part of the newcomers that living there became intolerable. Our reaction to mass immigration is not unique, it is prevalent and growing.

It only takes quick a look through my old MS Outlook contacts and retired Rolodex cards to see the obvious: I held out hope for my former home a lot longer than most of my high school classmates, college friends and former business associates. The exodus of my social and business cohort from South Florida was caused by the "otherness" of alien immigrants and our correct perception of their disrespect for our way of life, and that of our ancestors. Now our replacement population shows every intention of remaining allegiant-in-diaspora to their former homelands through the generations.

I'd like to tell the demographers where they can stick their asinine assumptions.

The article continues:
Advocates for stricter immigration laws question whether a stable, or even a shrinking population, is bad.

"Don't we have concerns about congestion and sprawl and pollution?" asked Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for stricter immigration policies.

"Maybe those metro areas should think about what it would take to make Americans want to live there," Camarota said.
If only our leaders understood that this last point is far more important to cities' health than importing cheap labor that spurs the rancor that accompanies diversity and multiculturalism. I suppose the onerous aspects of mass immigration are felt more keenly by those of us who were raised to believe, correctly, that a nation exists to promote and strengthen its culture; that is has a duty to honor ancestral legacy; and that it carries a prescription for a pathway to assure that there remains a birthright legacy for future generations to cherish.

It is traditional Conservative impulses that lead people to flee cities inflicted with the results of the mass-immigrationist mentality, regardless of the evacuees' political persuasion. The unwelcomed replacement of Americans in metropolis should serve as a forewarning that all is not well with the status quo.

Screw political correctness. This invasion must end.


Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Saturday, March 31, 2007

A Troll Gets His Due

I've been following, and participating, in a tit-for-tat with a troll who has taken up residence at FreedomFolks using the nom-de-keyboard "hannitized." He's not really worthy of the level of respect I usually demand to bring up such lunacy; he ran away from this blog's comment section after I made it clear that he would not be allowed to post non-sequitur and/or nonsensical Leftist links to make his feeble points. I'll not be a party to driving traffic, and its related profit, to the DailyKos or Indymedia crowd. The only reason I bring him up now is that this troll's comments serve as the archetype evil for anyone who is trying to make a point about the vital dangers of multiculturalism, the cultural emptiness of diversity, and the inescapable primacy of tribal instinct - hard-coded into human nature - that makes promoting a too-heterogeneous society so horrifically wrong.

A couple of weeks ago, I decided that it was beneath my standards to address this quasi-sentient infestation directly at my friends' blog, so I began to comment on his comments in the third person. I also assumed a mocking tone and made every effort to find a more appropriate moniker for him. Eventually, I settled on "hispandertized" because it best described his position on most things: He's got a monumental inferiority complex that exhibits itself in puffed-up "my people are superior to your people, but your people STOLE OUR LANDS and made us less great than we ought to be" attitude. Every time another "American-by-technicality" is born into a family like that which begat this hispantertized pathogen, there is made another weak link in the chain that binds Americans together.

We are made less when such trolls have sex, except with themselves.

What's most laughable, and sad, about Jake's week-kneed little parasite is that he really doesn't know to what tribe he belongs. Sometimes he's a Spaniard, sometimes he's an indigenous Mexica, sometimes he's a Native American. But never, no never, is he an American - even though ours is the nation to which he was born, and he probably would swear to which he remains allegiant. But his rantings betray him. He hates America. He hates it's origins. He hates anything that might be a byproduct of Western Civilization's success especially if its origin is even tangentially Anglo Saxon.

But he loves all things Mexican.

Mexico's indigenous tribes can do no wrong in his book. America would be best served if that third-world nation's people could freely retake the lands America won, then purchased 150 years ago. To him, the "indigenous peoples" still own it depite the fact that the mythical lands of Atzlan were Mexican territory for barely a quarter-century before America fought and won them in a war. Most of us know that reconquista is not a salient point of view for a true American; however, it is an unwavering belief for most Mexicans.

Hispandertized is walking, talking proof that some tribes just will never assimilate fully to the American way. The longer we allow the alien invasion, particularly from our south, to proceed at such breakneck pace, the harder it will be for this nation to remain unified throughout its next generations. I have to thank this troll for being exemplar of how foolishly wrong the notion that "all peoples are compatible with American ideals" really is.

Seeing that hispandertized lives to browbeat us with the wonders and moral superiority of the indegnous people's of Mexico, I thought I'd close with an brilliant example of those "wonders."

Enjoy:

Mordida, Bribes - Some Things in Mexico Seem To Never Change

In Chiapas, the Chamula Indians obligate their tribesmen to be members of the ruling PRI party. Anyone in the tribe who prefers membership in a different party or even criticizes the PRI is ostracized and driven from their tribal lands. The PRI maintains this loyalty by providing the Chamulas with the Coca Cola franchise for the region. Big time mordida.



When creatures like hispandertized call me a "racist," it's confirmation that I'm correct in my analysis of the alien invasion. How ironic is it that he cannot acknowledge the tribal preference for one's own kind that motivates him! Only someone filled with equal parts hate for his nation and self-loathing would invade someone else's Internet domain, build a soapbox there and do nothing but berate the virtual townsfolk who happen by.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Core Lessons: Unique American Culture

This piece was originally written either in the late 1990's or in 2000. It has existed in various versions, most of which were longer. When it came to writing something I wanted to leave for my kids to read, I decided to pare it down and tighten it up.

This is the result from early 2002:

Yes, there is a "unique American Culture"

Patriotic Americanism must continue to prevail over the desires of those who wish to deny that there is such a thing as "a unique American culture." Our ancestors anticipated attempts to lead our nation down a path to balkanization and expected us to stand fast against them. We must consistently refute lies that contend America was founded by and populated by people possessing broadly diverse perspectives and ideals. The ideas behind concepts like multiculturalism and diversity were anathema in the America of 1776 and for nearly 200 years thereafter.

In their faith, habits and principles, the first American citizens were a most narrowly diverse lot, separated only by slight variations in Christian denomination. In their ethics, morals and values, the first Americans could only be described as virtually homogenous. It was the similarity not the diversity of our forefathers and founders that set the stage for America to become a great nation.

Those who advocate diversity and multiculturalism as being historically important to this nation's greatness are dangerously wrong. Using their twisted logic, we are to believe that the ideals driving Islamic terrorists to fly planes into buildings are societally compatible with the motivations that drive Presbyterian women to have fundraising bake sales. Diversity theory places Christian Baptism on par with Animist ritual mutilation of baby girls' genitalia. Diversity theory blindly accepts into our midst hordes of incompatible, poorly educated, virtually aliterate(if not outright alingual) illegal alien border-jumpers from third-world Kleptocracies because it is supposedly in keeping with "the things for which this nation stands." There is no doubt that our founders would be nauseated by such absurd notions.

Thomas Jefferson expressed concern about this issue in "Notes on Virginia" (brackets added for clarity):

"…But are there no inconveniences to be thrown into the scale against the advantage expected from a multiplication of numbers by the importation of foreigners? It is for the happiness of those united in society to harmonize as much as possible in matters which they must of necessity transact together. Civil government being the sole object of forming societies, its administration must be conducted by common consent. Every species of government has its specific principles.

Ours perhaps are more peculiar than those of any other in the universe. It is a composition of the freest principles of the English constitution, with others derived from natural right and natural reason. To these nothing can be more opposed than the maxims of absolute monarchies [the equivalent of today's despots, tyrants and kleptocrats]. Yet, from such, we are to expect the greatest number of emigrants. They will bring with them the principles of the governments they leave, imbibed in their early youth; or, if able to throw them off, it will be in exchange for an unbounded licentiousness, passing, as is usual, from one extreme to another. It would be a miracle were they to stop precisely at the point of temperate liberty. These principles, with their language, they will transmit to their children. In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass."

Jefferson chafed at the thought that we could, by inaction, surrender our homogeneity and he was greatly concerned that we might! All this banter about diversity and multiculturalism would have given him fits.

Nothing exemplifies how far we have strayed from the intentions and dreams of our founders more clearly than our current immigration policy. Yes, immigration is an important part of our history. But nobody from the pro-immigration camp wants to discuss the fact that the none of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were immigrants, they were colonist and British subjects. Every member of the Constitutional Convention of 1789 except Alexander Hamilton was born in the colonies. The absolute truth is that the vast majority of our first citizens were Americans by birth and the vast majority of Americans have always been "citizens by birth." We have never had as many as 15 percent of our residents being of foreign origin.

Cast in this proper light, the "nation of immigrants" mantra to which we are constantly subjected becomes tritely idiomatic. If we are to be strictly precise, our history is one forged by colonists who became the first American citizens via revolution. These originals were augmented by immigrants who were eager assimilants: All Americans. Before and until the immigration reforms of 1965, between one quarter and one third of all migrants to this land could not adapt and ended up leaving. Those who came here "seeking a better life" without possessing the all-important corollary "dream of becoming American" were roughly cast aside by a society that was decidedly intolerant of selfish opportunists who didn't want to "get with the program." Promoting diversity for the sake of diversity is as accepting of malignancies as it is of the benign; it will always be an utterly stupid practice.

The only way in which we can assure America's long-term continued success as a sovereign nation is to establish new policies promoting American cultural homogeneity via imposing strict limits on the number of immigrants, demanding rigorously-enforced visa and border laws and insisting that all new arrivals submit to and successfully complete compulsory "patriotic assimilation" courses soon after their arrival. Those who cannot accept our unique culture, mores and values as their own, forsaking all others, should be summarily returned to their countries of origin.

Technorati tags: ,

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Orwell Lives In UK!

I'll presume he's not eating at McDonalds so as not to upset Prince Charles and his showhound, Camilla.

Saying 'bloody foreigner' is ruled racist Uk News News Telegraph
Law Lords have ruled that calling someone a "bloody foreigner" and saying "get back to your own country" can amount to racial abuse.
This is from the land of "thought crime." The politically correct religiously secular left must clip headlines like this for their collages. Surely it's a papier mache and Elmer's glue night somewhere because of this!

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Revisting the Evils of the Anti-Racists

For the past few days I've been parrying with a decidedly inferiority-complex-bound intellect (I use the term loosely) in the comments section over at FreedomFolks who is openly determined to promote unfettered mass immigration as a penance for the evils of his ancestors. I've rarely come across someone so consumed by self-loathing in the 13 years I've been posting stuff on the Internet; today, the insistent little gnat came out of the closet and revealed his guilt for having Spanish, Italian and "Native American" blood. It appears he believes he must make amends with the "Indian" part of himself for the things that his Spaniard ancestors did. It all would be comical and laughable if his premise were not so pathetic, and his desire to take the nation down with him so virulent. I guess his being miserable about the combination of genes with which he was born isn't enough, he has to make us share his despair.

No thanks.

As is the case with all discussions in which a leftist is the antagonist, the time is fast approaching in which we can all invoke Godwin's Law and be done with him. He's already devolved into calling racist anyone who disagrees with his assessment that this nation is evil and must make amends for every wrong he perceives it has ever done by allowing ourselves to be over-run by the denizens of the third world. Right now, he's stuck on ad-hominems about our being bigoted for even thinking that this nation has a culture we should be concerned about keeping. Such is the plight of the anti-racist: He cannot see that he has become the reverse-actualization of the very figment-evil he decries.

All of this got me to thinking about a long ago post in which I agreed with Jim Kalb's assessment of the anti-racists. Nearly two years after the fact, this page is one of the most read of all I've ever posted here. And I think it's time that I bring Kalb's work to the forefront again. After all, the time I wasted responding to guilt-ridden trolls has to be good for something, right?

Anti-racism -- Jim Kalb

Indeed, anti-racism requires anti-majority racism. An anti-racist ruling class must treat the majority as presumptively wrong. "Ingrained social stereotypes" -- the culture and habits of the majority -- must be discredited because their dominance puts minorities at a disadvantage. Since habits and culture are what make a people what it is, the things that make the majority a people must be attacked; the majority must be defined as racist, and therefore evil and unfit to rule or even exist. "Racist" has the same function today that "nigger" once did: it makes a man less than human and so unfit for self-government.

Attempts to abolish deeply rooted human tendencies are necessarily tyrannical; "rule by the people" is absurd when a government that loses confidence in the people can dissolve it and form a new one. Such attempts inevitably fail, and succeed only in destroying traditional restraints. Attempts in Russia to abolish the profit motive ended, after unparalleled brutality and massacre, in lawless greed and mafia rule. It is not clear why attempts to abolish ethnicity should be more successful.

Rather than attempt a utopian transformation of human nature, it seems better to accept the distinctions men find important, and let them deal with them in customary ways that make sense to those involved; abuses and extreme cases can be dealt with as such. Things classified as racism -- ethnic loyalty and dominance -- are necessary features of social life. Something as closely related as ethnicity is to men's habits, attitudes and loyalties is plainly relevant to participation in a common effort like carrying on a business. The fact that men universally take ethnicity into account in choosing associates is the best possible evidence that it makes sense for them to do so.

For the last two years, I've lived in a rather mixed-ethnicity and mixed-race neighborhood. The student-of-human-nature part of me has been fascinated by the self-segregation that goes on here. Despite this being a very liberal and leftist college town, and despite my neighbors being predominately leftist in political persuasion, the strongest bonds I see growing in this most "utopian" for the multiculturalist setting, are between people who are of the same ethnicity and the same race. While we all exchange superficial pleasantries, the only times I have witnessed or participated in deep conversations about substantive issues, the participants have obvious ancient-tribal similarities. Heck, we even self-segregate our seating arrangements at our homeowners' association meetings. I notice this stuff and wonder who else sees the same things.

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , ,

|

Friday, February 02, 2007

You can go on believing all cutures are equal...

...but pardon me for thinking you're nuts.

WARNING
If you are squeamish, do not read further, and by all means don't click on the link and read more.


But if you do, I hope it gives you pause. If you believe that the Orwellian mantra "diversity is our strength" has even the smallest scintilla of truth, I feel sorry for you. You have been enslaved by the cult.

Cruellest cut in the name of Islam

Then the scissors went down between my legs and the man cut off my inner labia and clitoris. I heard it, like a butcher snipping the fat off a piece of meat. A piercing pain shot up between my legs, indescribable, and I howled. Then came the sewing: the long, blunt needle clumsily pushed into my bleeding outer labia, my loud and anguished protests, Grandma's words of comfort and encouragement. "It's just this once in your life, Ayaan. Be brave, he's almost finished." When the sewing was finished, the man cut the thread off with his teeth.

If you have a problem with my believing that a nation should have a predominate and dominating culture in order to survive, tough sh*t. If you want to experience the joy of learning about different cultures, please do so by traveling to distant lands, not by importing the toxic or even the exotic here. Imposing variety upon your neighbors because you think it will enrich them is not just un-neighborly, it's arrogantly evil.


Technorati tags: , , , ,

Labels: , , , ,

|

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

On Cultural Marxism

I was reviewing some old comments and came across one of my off-the-cuff replies that led me to do a bit of Googling on memes related to cultural Marxism:

"The Marxists who started the push for a politically correct (thus stripped of meaning and ripe for the seeds of socialism) culture in the 1920's have intellectual allies today and many of them are neoconservatives building a GOP apparatchik that they can lord over. The John Podhoretz's of the world are counting on the world's fast pace and complexity making it likely that there will remain near majority of the electorate that remains only superficially informed, thus cognitively disconnected from the complexities of Corporatists' machinations.

Sometimes I wish I could just slide through life ignorant like many of my friends. It would be a far less painful existence to be free from the dread I have for my daughter's future. But I cannot be an ignoramus. My disdain for liars and obfuscators has cost me dearly in my career and in my relationships. But those things are ephemeral and I must put up with the occasional loss of position or friendship if it means that when I leave this earthly plane I will be comfortable in knowing I have done all I can to pass to my progeny the same great things that were placed in my care by birth. The increase in the number of not so clever argumentative methods in use by mass immigrationists is a good sign, a sign of desperation, I hope."

With that, I bring you a feature; perhaps I'll do it regularly. Perhaps I won't.

Cavalcade of Conservatism
Linked quotes to stuff you should read right now


"Again, until recently, anyone who questioned, however gently, multiculturalism or mass immigration was treated like a piece of dirt..."
"Disguising malignant intent behind code words such as multiculturalism, diversity, tolerance, safe schools/safe sex, same-sex marriage, ‘gay’ rights, choice, and peace, New Left revolutionaries began taking America and the West down the path to familial and cultural suicide".
"My point is: we became accustomed to being told that we must watch our terminology, and that we must change our vocabulary in order to accommodate or placate a group of people. The reason? Because they had been victims, and in fact, our ancestors were the victimizers".

"If language is used to assault Western culture, regaining control over it should constitute our first line of defense. We have a right to resist those who advocate our nation’s self-termination. A policy which deprives us of self-determination and maybe our children of self-preservation is evil, and we have not just a right, but a duty to oppose it, even if it is championed by our own government; in fact, especially then."

"Truth be told, cultural Marxism is now the "frame" (apologies to cultural Marxist George Lakoff) through which most apolitical Americans now see reality. Since much of the population does not vote, it's no stretch to say that cultural Marxism has almost achieved hegemony in the United States."

"If you’d like a preview of an American fascist state, look at higher education. If Hitlerism ever comes to America, it won’t be marching with crosses and Bibles, but mouthing the platitudes of multiculturalism (cultural Marxism), while goose-stepping to the beat of Sgt. Pelosi’s PC Band."


This is a war. It is a to-the-death struggle between those who properly seek to keep things certain about our Republic and those who would exchange it for something radically different, and certainly less "free." Arm yourself with knowledge; keep it locked and loaded.



Technorati tags: , , ,

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Sunday, January 28, 2007

One of These Things is Not Like The Others

One of these things just doesn't belong. Can you tell which thing is not like the others?

Class Assignment

1) Click on the first link.

2) Then read the story that brings us the moronic quote of the day:

Secrets of Obama family unlocked - World - Times Online

" 'I believe the American electorate is ready to support leaders who embody the American dream despite their differences. In doing so, we affirm ourselves as a tolerant people,' said William Galston, a senior fellow in public policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington."

3) Then click on the second link.

4) Select and read the biographical information about any 5 random presidents and make note of their heritage (that's a reference to his parents and ancestry, for those of you who are Democrats).

5) In 150 words or less, tell me how this guy ever gets elected President of the United States of America; if you use the term "racist," or "Nazi," you get an automatic "F" and are banished to the Godwin's Law closet forever.

If the origins of a candidate for President of the United States are somehow off-limits for discussion, then the nation is already too far gone. It cannot be saved from falling victim to whatever ideaology opposes it because it will no longer have any ideaology or moral absolutes of its own. While I believe we've been led down a radical and dangerous path by political correctness, multiculturalism, forced diversity and redefined "tolerance" for 40 years or so, I don't believe we've fallen to the point at which we'd elect someone president who represents the eradication of our traditions and our culture. The Hate AmericaTM crowd loves Obama primarily because he represents the antithesis of Americanism.

I hope the Dhimmicrats do nominate him. It will ensure a GOP victory in 2008, and likely a sweep of both Houses of Congress by true Conservatives. It will be the biggest-ever GOTV boost for those who oppose the dogma and semantics of cultural Marxism.


Technorati tags:

Labels: , , , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Human nature surprises the New York Times

Hmmm. Curious stuff. I get the sense that the New York Times had a lot of trouble writing this article. It's as if they didn't see this stuff coming and are now perplexed as to why it is happening. All hail diversity!


Racial Hate Feeds a Gang War’s Senseless Killing

"Our cultural and ethnic diversity are cornerstones of a strong L.A.," the mayor [Antonio R. Villaraigosa] said Friday, "and violent crime motivated by the victim's skin color will not be tolerated."

Earl Ofari Hutchinson, an African-American syndicated columnist who plays host to the Los Angeles Urban Policy Roundtable, a weekly gathering in the Leimert Park neighborhood of South Los Angeles, said blacks complained that illegal Latin American immigrants were stealing jobs. Latinos, particularly newcomers unaccustomed to living among large numbers of African-Americans, in turn accuse blacks of criminal activity and harassing them.

"I think L.A. is a microcosm of what could happen in big cities in the future," Mr. Hutchinson said. "When we have the kind of tension you see in L.A. in the schools, the workplace and now hate-crime violence, my great concern is this is a horrific view of what could happen in other cities."

I'm amused at the non-sequitur nature of Villaraigosa's comment, especially as it is juxtaposed with Mr. Hutchinsons warning to America's big cities.

I'll ask again: What is it about mass-immigration that is supposed to "enrich" us? It really is sad that my rather dim view of human nature is so constantly and explicitly confirmed.

Technorati tags:
, , , , ,

Labels: , , ,

|

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Droppin' Anchor Babies in New Orleans

Babies of the reconstruction Chicago Tribune

NEW ORLEANS -- First came the storm. Then came the workers. Now comes the baby boom.
And next comes the time for American taxpayers to divvy up.

In the latest twist to the demographic transformation of New Orleans since it was swamped by Hurricane Katrina last year, hundreds of babies are being born to Latino immigrant workers, both legal and illegal, who flocked to the city to toil on its reconstruction.

Oh joy! Now not only do we have billions of money already wasted in the reconstruction, we're going to have a whole new perpetual underclass. Whee!
Last summer, researchers at Tulane University estimated that there were 5,000 to 7,000 illegal Latino workers in Orleans Parish alone, excluding non-working relatives. But some community workers estimate that tens of thousands have arrived since the storm.
Five...ten...twentyfive...do I hear 100 thousand? Estimates can be so hard to pin down, and it seems especially so when it comes to illegal aliens.
Lacking health insurance and barred from most government assistance, expectant immigrant mothers can go to only the handful of charitable clinics that are still operating and that do not question a woman's immigration status.

This should be a reminder to them that they aren't supposed to be here and are ripping us off by staying.

The two health units providing prenatal care run by the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals saw more than 1,200 pregnant women from January to mid-November. Virtually all were Latino immigrants.

According to the CIA Fact Book, the birth rate per 1000 population is currently 14.14 per year. Let's consider that this Latino population is 2.5 times the norm and peg it at 36 births per thousand. That more than 1200 pregnant Latino women at the two clinics over 11 months annualizes to 1300. Now, how many Latinos, using our reasonable assumptions, does it take to create 1300 babies in a year?

Drumroll please....


36,111

Isn't that special! And that's just the number representative from from two clinics. The real numbers are probably far, far greater. This is the real story, not any of that other misplaced sniveling compassionate drivel the MSM will use to frame this issue.

Most of the immigrants are not new to the United States. They come from Texas, Florida or California, seeking construction work that can pay $150 a day. But there are some newcomers, including Sara Alvarado, a 26-year-old Honduran, who arrived in the United States in August after a monthlong odyssey through Mexico with her partner, Tony, 32.
Isn't it interesting how the reporter manages to skirt reporting the likelihood that most of Nawlin's new residents are illegal aliens by stating that they came from some of the other states. Folks, you have to start reading this crap with a far more critical eye or they'll slip important factoids right by you.
When Alvarado finally got to New Orleans, brought into the country by coyotes, or smugglers, who charged $6,000, she was more than six months pregnant. The last time she had seen a doctor was four months before.
So. They owe coyote's money. Great. Now we'll have to fork over more tax dollars when the Coyotes kidnap the baby.

Now she is the mother of Jackson Antonio, a U.S. citizen who came into the world at Tulane-Lakeside Hospital 12 days early on Oct. 17, the day the 300 millionth American was born.Dr. Kevin Work, an obstetrician who started a private practice a year before the hurricane, has been offering a low-cost prenatal care package, charging about $800 for the full term of a pregnancy, a small fraction of the typical bill.

He said he delivers 50 to 70 babies a month, most born to Latino immigrants. He delivered Jackson Antonio, though he could not remember doing so, the memory lost in a blur of births.
I applaud the doctor for his charity, but in a sane nation, I'd also expect that ICE would be picking these women up at about 7.5 months and getting them out of country before they drop more anchor babies. Mexico can thank us for the excellent prenatal care.
Alvarado's baby was required to stay 48 hours in the hospital. But Alvarado had to leave after 24. Emergency Medicaid pays for up to a 24-hour hospital stay for a vaginal delivery and a 48-hour stay for a Caesarean section.

Does anybody hear the sound of cash registers?

She spent the next day looking for a car safety seat, which hospitals require to discharge new babies. Health workers at Catholic Charities eventually found a car seat for her, as well as a crib.

She started Jackson Antonio straight off on baby formula because she expected to go to work as soon as she recovered from the delivery. But she cannot leave home, because there is nobody to care for the baby.

And the sound keeps getting louder!
Her partner, Tony, who declined to provide his last name, spends most days waiting with the day laborers at a Shell gas station near their home. But demand for workers has slackened.
And louder! I see the need for more prison beds. Growing numbers of unemployed, uneducated men loitering where beer is sold cannot end up well. It just can't.
Meanwhile, bills are piling up, starting with repayment of the $6,000 they borrowed to pay the coyotes' fee. They have repaid only about $1,300, Alvarado said. And they need $350 a month just for their share of rent and utilities.
WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE STOP THE SOUND OF THAT CASH REGISTER IN MY HEAD???!!!
Alvarado must also send money to Honduras for her two daughters, ages 7 and 9, who live with her mother. Tony has three daughters in Honduras, too, living with their mother.
AIEEEEEEEEE! STOP! PLEASE...MAKE...IT...STOP!!!
She said she might return to Honduras because there was no point to staying if she could not work. "I came to make a future for my mother and my girls," she said.
Oh, thank God. I feel better.

But if she can work, she will probably stay.


...*sigh*

MEDIC!!!

And the baby boom may even provide an opportunity. She said she might go into business taking care of the babies of other Latino mothers."
I'm going to cry now. Good night.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Labels: , , ,

|

Thursday, December 14, 2006

If it walks like a duck...

A brief history:


  • November 19 - Congressman Tom Tancredo says in an interview with WorldNet Daily, "Look at what has happened to Miami. It has become a Third World country."
  • November 27 - Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen objected and extended an invitation to Congressman Tancredo to visit Miami saying, "come on down, Tom, the water's fine."
  • November 29 - Florida Governor Jeb Bush replies, "Miami is a wonderful city filled with diversity and heritage that we choose to celebrate, not insult.''
  • November 29 - Tancredo replies, "I certainly understand and appreciate your need and desire to try and create the illusion of Miami as a multiethnic 'All American' city. Indeed sir, one of us is naive."
  • December 12 - It is announced that Tancredo, taking up Bush and Ros-Lehtinen on their offer, will speak at the December 14 Rotary Club of Miami meeting about "Renewing America: The Need for Assimilation."
  • December 13 - The Rusty Pelician Restaurant cancels the Rotary meetings apparently after bomb and death threats were called into the Miami Herald and after the restaurant's staff balked at working at an event where Tancredo would be speaking.
  • December 13 - Scientists reiterate that animals that look like ducks, walk like ducks, crap like ducks and have duck DNA are, in fact, ducks.
  • December 13 - Tancredo spokesman Carlos Espinosa backs up the scientists with our December 14 quote of the day:

DenverPost.com - Tancredo's Miami speech canceled

"What says Third World Country more than a bomb threat at a speech by a politician?"

It cannot be said any better, folks!


Technorati tags: , , , ,, ,

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Religion of "piece?"

Ahhhh! The glory of multiculturalism's poison masked by the stench of political correctness to go lightly with one's morning coffee.


Raped in Oslo - The Brussels Journal


"Two out of three charged with rape in Norway’s capital are immigrants with a non-western background according to a police study. The number of rape cases is also rising steadily. Unni Wikan, a professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo, in 2001 said that 'Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes' because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The professor’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: 'Norwegian women must realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.'"

So Olso's per capita rape rate is now six times that of New York City and an academic (of course it had to be an academic) steps up to tell us that it is the west who must adapt to the more vile aspects of an imported culture born of Islam. I think they call that Dhimmitude, don't they?. I'm surprised he just didn't come out and say "If rape is inevitable, enjoy it."

I have to note that the press in Norway appears just as indoctrinated as most of America's MSM against providing news consumers with the proper facts to make any sort of value judgments, except for those that would be positive, when it comes to reporting on the activities of immigrant populations. In my previous post about the former-illegal-alien-cum-prospective-citizen who dragged a three-year-old boy to his death beneath her car last week, I note that after reading the story again, I'm struck by the reporter's seemingly intentional glossing-over the likelihood that the woman perpetrator was at one time an illegal alien; if the accused had been a non-minority native-born American, you can bet your sweet bippy that there would have been extensive background information in the story, and the reporter would probably have found somebody to quote out of context to make the alleged criminal out to be a bad person. Instead, the reporter goes about as far as she can to surround the accused with warm fuzzies.

Not only is there a subtle, endemic MSM bias against the native-born majorities of the West, there is also a not-so-subtle mandate for framing alien interlopers in the most positive terms allowed by every situation.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Labels: , , , ,

|

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

"The boy was dragged 0.85 miles..."

Arrrgghhh! I just want to spit:

Driver voices regret for fatal accident - baltimoresun.com

"The pickup truck driven by Arellano de Hogue struck 55-year-old Marjorie Thomas as she pushed her grandson, Elijah Cozart, in a stroller across Goucher Boulevard, just south of Colbury Road, near the boy's home, police said.

With the stroller caught in the undercarriage of the truck, the boy was dragged 0.85 miles before the driver briefly swerved into a yard on Regester Avenue and the child's body was dislodged, according to charging documents.

A police officer who followed drag and scuff marks from the scene of the crash to an address in the 1500 block of Regester Avenue found the child, gasping for air, near deep ruts in the grassy yard, according to charging documents. The boy's lower body had been mangled and his clothes were almost gone, police wrote in the court documents.

The blue stroller, located nearby in the driveway, was "twisted, in pieces and completely destroyed," according to the charging documents. Elijah was pronounced dead about 4:15 p.m. Friday at Good Samaritan Hospital."

Earlier in the story, the woman, a soon-to-be naturalized American citizen who came here from Mexico, said through an interpreter that she felt "really bad."

Court documents made public yesterday contained new details of the incident, including that the boy appeared to be conscious when police found him more than eight-tenths of a mile from where he was struck.

They also show that Arellano de Hogue told police that her brakes did not work because the stroller was stuck beneath the vehicle - and that when she was able to stop, she pulled the empty stroller from beneath the vehicle and drove home.

She told police that she did not call 911 about the incident "because of her 'nervous state' and it gave her amnesia," according to a statement of probable cause prepared for the court by police.

No. You feel "really bad" when you knock over somebody's mailbox. It appears from the story that Arrellano de Hogue was an illegal alien given a get into America free card by one of the previous amnesties our government has given millions interlopers who had no respect for our laws to begin with, so why would we expect her to stop after she ran over an elderly woman and crushed a child in a stroller?

More:

Another woman at her home, who was a passenger in the truck, told police that she and Arellano de Hogue were returning from a Wal-Mart at the time of the incident. That woman, who according to the court document gave differing accounts of what happened after the accident, was not charged.

Did her passenger have "amnesia" too?

Then there's this:

Arellano de Hogue is a permanent resident of the United States and has taken - but not yet received the results of - a citizenship test, her lawyer, Michael A. Zwaig, said in court.

If this woman has taken her citzenship test, then why in the hell does she still need a freaking interpreter? Sigh. And the dimwits at DHS will still probably make her a citizen. Just watch.

Technorati tags: , ,, , ,


Labels: , , ,

|

Monday, November 20, 2006

Fisking points: Hispanics (supposedly) react to GOP 's being mean

Last Sunday there was a "news" story in the St. Pete Times (Florida's second most liberal paper after the Palm Beach Post) that reads much more like an Op-Ed aimed at putting fear in the minds of all non-Hispanic Conservatives than it reads "news." This is just another example of a key tactic being employed throughout the MSM and the Corporatist wing of the GOP. It is nothing but a thinly-veiled attempt to use political correctness as a tool for silencing those of us who are opposed to our nation being picked apart by "multiculturalism" much like and expensive car parked overnight in a bad neighborhood will surely be less of a car by morning.


Make no mistake about it, many of our supposedly Conservative "leaders" along with their leftist-elite de facto conspirators are hell bent on performing the societal equivalent of broken windows experiments upon us. They're hoping we won't notice that a byproduct of their need for cheap labor or desire for creating new, compliant voting blocs will surely be the wholesale transformation of our culture, and with it will come the destruction ofthe very things that made and have kept us a great nation.


Let's take a look inside the mind of a couple of clueless reporters, Jose Cardenas and Adam Smith:


Hispanic voter shift: anomaly or new rule?

"Here's something Florida Republicans a year ago never dreamed possible: a Democrat representing heavily Republican Little Havana in the state House.

Of course they wouldn't have dreamed it. Now, why don't our intrepid reporters tell us right away how the demographics have shifted in that barrio? Folks, here's a hint: "Little Havana" isn't majority Cuban anymore. Every day it becomes more and more of a hodge-podge slum made up of various lower-class, government-dependent imports from Central and South America, the very sort of imports that, once they access our franchise, will vote consistently Democrat. These newspaper shills are counting on readers to grow tired of the story and stop reading. They start by claiming the Little Havana is a GOP stronghold and end by pointing out that it isn't.
But that's precisely what happened on Election Day, as Democrats in Florida and across the country gained ground among Hispanic voters. If the trend continues, it could have far-reaching political implications.

No it isn't "precisely what happened." Far from it. Toward the end of this article, there are hints that the reporters understand what went on, but just don't get around to reporting it. It would not help them advance "the cause" they favor; that is, the cause of mass immigration. They never get around to pointing out clearly that actual turnout data indicates that for the first time since the Reagan revolution GOP turnout was depressed across the board. The election had no far reaching political implications unless all GOP turnout has been permanently affected. That's highly unlikely.



On Election Day, for the first time since 1976 - when Jimmy Carter got at least half of the Hispanic vote here - the Democratic candidate on the ballot's biggest race got at least an equal share of their vote as the Republican, said Sergio Bendixen, a Democratic pollster in Miami.

Let's all just ignore the fact that the "equal share" was an historically unrepresentative one.


Democrat Jim Davis and Republican Charlie Crist each got 49 percent of the Hispanic vote, according to television network exit polls.

Exit polls are notoriously irrelevant. With the growing influence of absentee and early voters on election outcomes, polling people on election day, particularly as they leave polling locations, captures an ever-decreasing part of the whole picture.


"We now believe we are in a position to be much more aggressively competitive within the Hispanic community as a result of this success," said Luis Navarro,executive director of the Florida Democratic Party.

Now, would we expect him to say anything else?

Another exit poll by the nonpartisan William C. Velasquez Institute found that Davis received 53 percent of the Hispanic vote and Crist received 42 percent. The poll also indicated that two-thirds of Hispanic voters cast ballots for Democrats in their congressional races.

This is misleading on two counts: 1) It fails to note that one fifth of Florida's registered voters' Congressional intentions went uncounted because their Congressman was unchallenged in the general election; and 2) the reporters don't point out that the William C. Velasquez Institute is a race-baiting, pro-Hispanic, reconquista front group.
"The question is whether this is a trend or is it a reaction in '06 to A) the immigration issue or B) the anti-Republican feeling nationwide," said the institute's Alvaro Fernandez.

My question for Mr. Alvarez is: How important is finding results that skew your way to the prospects for your next Paycheck?


Nowhere was the swing for Democrats more evident than in Miami-Dade County,where Democrat Luis Garcia was elected to the state House in a district that includes Little Havana and that historically has been dominated by Republicans.

Here is presented a new version of the "Prop 187 killed the GOP in California" false meme. In California, the non-Latino white middle and upper middle classes have been fleeing since the court ruled - in declaring Prop 187 unconstitutional - they must bear the disproportionate burden of public service costs for illegal aliens and their misbegotten anchor babies.

The original Cubans in Little Havana are being replaced by lower class recent balseros and other low-skilled, low-wage social burdens we've imported from the Southern Hemisphere. It's going to elect Democrats from here on out. Hialeah has had a Democrat mayor for what, 20 years? Fact errors and omissions like this would have earned me an instant "F" in my college journalism courses.


Like Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who is married to a Mexican immigrant and speaks Spanish, President Bush has made Hispanic voters a priority.

Bush got about 40 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2004. But exit polls last week showed that Republican candidates for the House of Representatives received only about 30 percent of the vote, while Democratic candidates got 69 percent.


These guys just don't get it that they're not comparing mangos to mangos. Never mind that that they're trying to read tea leaves grown in a banana republic where nothing makes sense to those in possession of American sensibilities anyway.


This week President Bush named Florida Sen. Mel Martinez general chairman of the Republican Party, a move seen by both Republicans and Democrats as an attempt to woo Hispanic voters back.

Woo them back? Let's examine what that really means: If we're generous and grant that Martinez at the helm of the GOP means a 5% bump in the Hispanic vote, and conservatively estimate that in the process he jettisons 5% of the White vote, it means that the GOP is hoping to increase its representative share of 8% of the electorate by 5% while decreasing its representative share of 80% of the electorate by 5%.

So, in this best case Mel Martinez scenario the GOP gains four Hispanic votes for every 1000 cast and loses 40 votes for every 1000 cast. Since when is intentionally striving to attain a net loss of 3.6% of the vote a "good thing" in politics?


"Democrats should be happy that this vote swung back our way," said Simon Rosenberg, president of NDN, a liberal advocacy group in Washington, D.C. But "if there isn't comprehensive immigration reform there will be consequences for Democrats because then we will look like Republicans."

No, if there is "comprehensive immigration reform," you'll piss off just as much of the majority as the Senate did - maybe more. But I suppose they're your race baited talking points, so I won't quibble your with idiocy any Further.



In contrast to Hispanic voters around the country, who tend to vote for Democrats, Florida has long been an anomaly because of its Cuban-American bloc that prefers the Republican Party.

But not since 1996, when many Hispanic voters across the country were turned off by heated Republican rhetoric over welfare reform, have Florida Republicans fared so poorly with Hispanic voters. Al Cardenas, former state GOP chairman, said it was a direct result of the immigration debate.

"There was a lot of rhetoric during this campaign season that hurt the sensibilities of some Hispanics and the end result was a predictable step-back," Cardenas said.


And there has been a lot of invading going on for the last 40 years that has disgusted much of the majority and led hundreds of thousands of people, my family included, to abandon their life-long homes in order to maintain American standards of living and pass along an unbastardized cultural heritage to their children. I believe that in the minds of our leaders my family's long-term best interests should carry more weight than any foreign born's, regardless of their immigration status. And when half of any new ethnic bloc is here in violation of and disregard for our laws, I care less and less about how my antipathy appears to people who are naturalized but champion the "rights" of a class of people who should not be here. Do you get that, Al?
Rosenberg said the firm stand on illegal immigration by some Republican candidates could harm their party long term in Florida and some Southwest states. He compared it to California in the 1990s when then Gov. Pete Wilson promoted a ballot initiative that, before it was overturned by the courts, denied most public services to undocumented immigrants.

Some political observers say Wilson doomed the Republican Party among Hispanic voters in California, causing Democrats to eventually dominate state government.



We've already been over it. It's a travesty that Pete Wilson is continually demonized for the result of the voters' intent being tossed aside by the courts. It boggles the mind that so many people buy into the silly notion that a constitutional amendment aimed at curtailing illegal immigration that passed with a significant margin is the reason California is now a blue state. I guess it is true that people will believe anything if you tell them to believe it often enough. Grey Davis knew what he was doing when he refused to appeal the lower court's decision: He was intentionally making the Hispanization of California permanent in order to make it a blue state. Period. It worked.

There are strong inferences that must be considered by GOP leadership before it goes along with President Bush's desire to have Mel Martinez be the public face of the Republican Party. The GOP basically has written off California, but it expects a different result if it Mexifornicates the entire nation? Give - me - a - break!


In Florida, increasing diversity within the Hispanic community has gradually improved Democrats' chances at the votes of Hispanics, who make up about 12 percent of the electorate

South Florida remains largely Cuban-American. But Puerto Ricans and Hispanics from Mexico and Central and South America who are more inclined to vote for Democrats have increasingly moved to the state, particularly to Central Florida.

For example, while there are 736,000 Cubans and 90,000 Puerto Ricans in Miami-Dade County, according to the U.S. Census, in Orange County there are 115,000 Puerto Ricans but only 16,000 Cubans.



Here lies the real story: Except for a dwindling number of hold-outs who hate the Democrat party for JFK's abandoning them at the Bay of Pigs, Hispanics vote predominately for Democrats. Why isn't this at the top of the story? What agenda might these ethically-bastardized media folks be wanting to convey?

Shhh. Be very, very quiet. We don't want the natives to notice they're being disenfranchised in the name of cheap labor and votes!


"I think what has been happening in the last couple of decades, a large influx of non-Cuban Latinos have been moving to the area," said Annabelle Conroy, an assistant professor of political science at the University of Central Florida. "They don't have the attachment to the Republican Party that Cuban-Americans do."

In South Florida, increasing diversity in the Hispanic population also was one reason Garcia said he won his state House seat.

He pointed out that a well-known Cuban restaurant former President Ronald Reagan visited in the 1980s to promise that Cuba would be freed from Castro is now a Mexican restaurant.


So, La Esquina de Tejas is now a Mexican restaurant? I guess the Cuban power brokers eat somewhere else for lunch, then drive home to Kendall or Doral or something. There isn't "diversity" in Dade County. There are only pockets of cultural "singularity" whose residents seeth with disdain for those living in the other balkanized enclaves around them. I know there are some who find such things "refreshing," but it offends my sensibilities to witness the denigration of my heritage. I've lived in Miami. There's nothing there for any American soul whose attachment to the sacrifices his forebears made is still strong; there is an expectation there that American's must assimilate to them, not the other way around. And Mel Martinez wants their votes. The GOP will lose mine permanently in the process.


In addition to demographic changes, Garcia and Navarro, executive director of the Florida Democratic Party, said the party launched an unprecedented media campaign statewide to try to get more Hispanic voters.

In South Florida, the party ran Spanish-language radio and television advertisements highlighting to Cuban-Americans issues of concern to all voters, such as property insurance.

"Our voters are getting more sophisticated. They will vote on candidates and issues" besides those related to Cuba, said Garcia. "Keep in mind that this is not Little Havana anymore. It's like little Latin America now."



Using one election as a gauge of increased sophistication is like having one botox treatment and claiming to have had a face lift.


Along the Interstate 4 corridor, the advertising campaign featured bilingual spots targeting non-Cuban Hispanics on economic issues.

But not everyone sees gloom for the Republican Party among Hispanics in Florida. While Hispanics in Central Florida voted predominantly for Democrats, Crist still received 70 percent of the Cuban vote in Miami-Dade County, said Dario Moreno, director of the Metropolitan Center at Florida International University.


Let's not remind Dario that it wasn't all that long ago, before any of the Marielitos earned the vote, that the GOP always carried a guaranteed 90%+ of the same demographic. What a shocker! Who knew that people who grew up in a socialist country would end up leaning leftist when given the right to vote in the nation in which they found a home...one in a community that really wasn't all that different from the corrupt place they left. It's just easier to buy nice stuff in Miami than it is in Havana.


What made the difference in Miami-Dade, he said, was that some Cuban-Americans did not go to the polls because they were disenchanted by infighting among Republicans For the first time since I've been doing this..." he said, "Cuban voter turnout was low."

Another nugget of truth gets buried at the bottom. Nope, no hidden agendas to see here. Move along.

Cardenas said Republicans already have taken the first step toward getting theHispanic vote back in Florida and elsewhere.

"My sense is just as we did after 1996, we're going to make a comeback if we're smart about it," Cardenas said. "And the choice of Mel Martinez will go a long way to doing that."


Right, Al. And the trade off will be poison to the GOP base.

 


Technorati tags: ,, , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

|