Main Bush dispute is with the dictionary, not with immigration restrictionists
You've just got to read this whole article. I've pulled out what I feel is the freshest argument:
Having people who live Inside The Beltway decide on their own what this nation's character will be, and let's not try to deny that our nation's character is what is really most at stake in this immigration debate, is akin to having pedophiles designing playgrounds. We don't know for sure what the outcome will be, but it is a very good bet that it won't be a safe one.
Technorati tags: Senate Idiots, Mel Martinez, Congress, sovereignty, H.R. 4437, amnesty, protest, political correctness, death of the west, xenophilia, We Need a Wall, hispanic vote, illegal immigration, illegal alien, immigration reform, employer sanctions, immigration, government incompetence, cleft society, diversity, multiculturalism, The Beltway, definitions, character
UPDATE: Zogby Poll: Pols Probably Won't Fix U.S. Immigration Problems
HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE - 'Comprehensive' Immigration by Phyllis Schlafly
"In another semantic deception, Bush said in Cancun that he is committed to signing a 'comprehensive immigration bill. And by 'comprehensive,' I mean not only a bill that has border security in it, but a bill that has a worker permit program in it. That's an important part of having a border that works.'
That statement is false, a non sequitur, and offensive to the intelligence and wishes of the American people. Our experience with the 1986 law proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that amnesty destroys border security and quadruples the number trying to enter the United States illegally.
Even the use of the word 'comprehensive' is odious. For 20 years, those of us who have fought education issues know that 'comprehensive' is the code word used to conceal from parents the fact that sex education includes teaching kids in coed classrooms how to use condoms.
Likewise, 'comprehensive' border security means concealing from the public that it means immediately legalizing illegal immigrants who are already in the United States and giving worker permits to many more foreigners to come in, while giving us only pie-in-the-sky promises about closing our borders to illegal entry."
"Having people who live Inside The Beltway decide...is akin to having pedophiles designing playgrounds."
I had not considered how often the use of the word "comprehensive" is used by politicians to obfuscate points they really don't want The People to understand. It begs the question: "Whom do these pandering weasels truly represent?" Surely it is not me, my family nor anyone else who believes that America does have a unique culture worth preserving, that its citizens have the right to countermand any legislative proposal, and that we have the right to make them do whatever the majority wants. And that goes doubly so for our elected leaders' responsibility to do what we want even on issues they think that they know better than we do. Having people who live Inside The Beltway decide on their own what this nation's character will be, and let's not try to deny that our nation's character is what is really most at stake in this immigration debate, is akin to having pedophiles designing playgrounds. We don't know for sure what the outcome will be, but it is a very good bet that it won't be a safe one.
Technorati tags: Senate Idiots, Mel Martinez, Congress, sovereignty, H.R. 4437, amnesty, protest, political correctness, death of the west, xenophilia, We Need a Wall, hispanic vote, illegal immigration, illegal alien, immigration reform, employer sanctions, immigration, government incompetence, cleft society, diversity, multiculturalism, The Beltway, definitions, character
UPDATE: Zogby Poll: Pols Probably Won't Fix U.S. Immigration Problems
